krimekat
Amazed and Baffled
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2008
- Messages
- 5,877
- Reaction score
- 36
is there further information about who exactly the officer was working for as security? As in what entity he was patrolling for? If a private company or if for the housing authority? Because I would think it would matter, at least to me, as to whether the officer was justified based upon seeing the young men out walking at night with further investigating or looking to see what their business was.
For instance, if hired by the neighborhood housing authority or some other governmental agency they have a right to govern their occupants and lay down certain rules, such as no one living there not on lease, no one living there who is convicted felon, no loitering in or on teh street after [insert time here], no loud music, no parties etc etc etc.
Who was he patrolling on behalf of, what rules was he enforcing and did he have a right to be looking over these kids if he was unaware of gun or anklet? How can anyone know without that info whether he was being over vigilant or "profiling" or had a right to be suspicious of the young men who apparently ran when they saw him seeing them?
StL PD officer was working for a private firm which provides security in that beautiful neighborhood 'cause StL PD apparently doesn't patrol as well as they want -- I do know of a few SLU professors & one Wash U med student (friends) who live there -- and heck yeah, there's "profiling" in that 'hood -- security & LE knows who lives where in that community