DS2021
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 20, 2021
- Messages
- 3,699
- Reaction score
- 15,835
Where did you hear this?Ms Moore identified two of little Jane Doe’s extended family members and reached out to both of them.
Where did you hear this?Ms Moore identified two of little Jane Doe’s extended family members and reached out to both of them.
Not OP but CeCe Moore was interviewed in the Our Precious Hope documentary and said two distant family members were located, but they did not react positively and refused to assist. Hopefully things have changed since then.Where did you hear this?
Genetic genealogy has been underway for a number of years in this case, see the post of April 2023. The documentary with CeCe is also on Youtube.If genetic genealogy is being done on her that’s good news. She has a very good chance of being identified.
Just wanted to post a better link as the original took me all sorts of sideways
www.audacy.com/podcast/the-show-on-kmox-1da3d/episodes/cece-moore-investigating-a-st-louis-unsolved-murder-from-1983-508ff
Also interesting to note @CeCeMoore notes in the interview that she's been working this case on almost 3 years.
Theres some graphic photos in that doc. Just a warningGenetic genealogy has been underway for a number of years in this case, see the post of April 2023. The documentary with CeCe is also on Youtube.
I heard that they won’t cooperate .Ms Moore identified two of little Jane Doe’s extended family members.
I heard that they won’t cooperate .
This gives me some hope! Please let this be a piece to this puzzle.Ms Moore identified two of little Jane Doe’s extended family members and reached out to both of them.
Not necessarily. Could be distantly related and did not know anything about their relatives. Could be elderly and sick. JD could have been adopted out or fostered and they didnt even know she existed.IMO, that's very telling.
The case was updated in Namus last week but I can't see what changed. There's still the same 12 ruleouts that have been posted here several times this year already, so I won't repeat the list. Consuela Cash and Kelly Staples are not on the exclusion list.I did it! I submitted a note to the investigator to ask if either girl can be considered for review as a possible match for our girl
1) Consuela Cash: Missing Person / NamUs #MP15293
2) Kelly Juanita Staples: Missing Person / NamUs #MP2893
i didn’t see a change either but maybe the part where they mention advanced forensic bone testing suggests she was not from the area, listing possible states she was from.The case was updated in Namus last week but I can't see what changed. There's still the same 12 ruleouts that have been posted here several times this year already, so I won't repeat the list. Consuela Cash and Kelly Staples are not on the exclusion list.