gitana1
Verified Attorney
- Joined
- May 31, 2005
- Messages
- 29,387
- Reaction score
- 230,047
It has bearing on whether the waitress had reason to believe the baby MAY be in danger. This situation really puts the restaurant and waitress in a tricky situation. They can't refuse to serve the woman without exposing themselves to legal action. They can't really even ask her how much she has had to drink without likewise subjecting themselves to liability. If they continue to serve her and something does happen, they are going to have target on them. In this case, I think the best course of action, from a legal standpoint, was to notify the police.
This was an "off duty" waitress. Not the one serving her. Management didn't call the police or advise the off duty waitress to do so. The waitress' mother did via a text message. The waitress was later fired.
But anyhow, as you know, a business can absolutely refuse to serve any person as long as they are not discriminating due to race, religion, etc.:
Further, they can totally ask her how much she has had to drink as it is actually against the law in Arkansas to sell alcohol to an intoxicated person:Do Restaurants Have the Unrestricted Right to Refuse Service?
No. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 explicitly prohibits restaurants from refusing service to patrons on the basis of race, color, religion, or natural origin. In addition, most courts don’t allow restaurants to refuse service to patrons based on extremely arbitrary conditions. For example, a person likely can’t be refused service due to having a lazy eye.
So Are "We Reserve the Right to Refuse Service to Anyone" Signs in Restaurants Legal? Yes, however they still do not give a restaurant the power to refuse service on the basis of race, color, religion, or natural origin. These signs also do not preclude a court from finding other arbitrary refusals of service to be discriminatory. Simply put, restaurants that carry a "Right to Refuse Service" sign are subject to the same laws as restaurants without one. http://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/restaurants-right-to-refuse-service.html
The bottom line is that the lady who was arrested was released with no charges. That means she was not intoxicated nor was she found to have endangered her child. And the off-duty waitress who butted in? She lost her job for her conduct.ARKANSAS
TITLE 3. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES
CHAPTER 4. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES GENERALLY – PERMITS
SUBCHAPTER 4. VIOLATIONS
§ 3-4-404. Class B violations.
The following acts on the part of the permittee are Class B violations:
(18) Selling to an intoxicated person;
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCcQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgovinfo.library.unt.edu%2Fngisc%2Freports%2Far.pdf&ei=Gn40U_-4OcrroATAnIGwBw&usg=AFQjCNFKBVEC6ms4pm35Q0hjE7K8GjVyjw&sig2=-M2vFiex52eK_aU18aLofQ&bvm=bv.63808443,d.cGU&cad=rja
Those facts evidence, to me, what really happened here.