RR0004
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2008
- Messages
- 19,987
- Reaction score
- -26
OMGoodness..too funny. Didn't ya just feel so sorry for these case workers?And as you might not be aware, there are no phones in Italy.....:waitasec:
OMGoodness..too funny. Didn't ya just feel so sorry for these case workers?And as you might not be aware, there are no phones in Italy.....:waitasec:
And as you might not be aware, there are no phones in Italy.....:waitasec:
From what was on Geraldo (Patty G's link in news today), I understood BC to say that the defense can still get their story in about ICA being abused without actually putting ICA on the stand through good cross examinations of witnesses to whom ICA had told her stories of abuse.
Would this be considered hearsay? With all of ICA's lies, how would the DT be able to claim that this was the only one truth she told? Is this where GA will come in?
How would the SA be able to counter that testimony if mental experts are not allowed? Would the DFCA report help?
And as you might not be aware, there are no phones in Italy.....:waitasec:
I'm confused. Yesterday the 2 mental health experts were added to the state's witness list.
Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - List of Motions **NO DISCUSSION HERE PLEASE**
Wasn't the whole point of the motion in limine to exclude the mental health experts to keep them from testifying? During the last hearing it was a huge bone of contention .
And now apparently the state has put them on their witness list?:waitasec:
What is going on? Isn't there a risk of them speaking of the very issues that they earlier wanted to keep them quiet about?
This came as quite a surprise to me and I am very curious how this is going to work given that they filed a motion to keep them off the defense witness list.
I just assumed that she meant they were in Italy temporarily since she said they were "now in Italy", (like, on a trip or something).
Anyway, they probably didn't pursue it because they could see there was no point. They were evasive during the interviews and just wanted to talk about how the OCSO was out to get KC.
I'm confused. Yesterday the 2 mental health experts were added to the state's witness list.
Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - List of Motions **NO DISCUSSION HERE PLEASE**
Wasn't the whole point of the motion in limine to exclude the mental health experts to keep them from testifying? During the last hearing it was a huge bone of contention .
And now apparently the state has put them on their witness list?:waitasec:
What is going on? Isn't there a risk of them speaking of the very issues that they earlier wanted to keep them quiet about?
This came as quite a surprise to me and I am very curious how this is going to work given that they filed a motion to keep them off the defense witness list.
And as you might not be aware, there are no phones in Italy.....:waitasec:
I'm confused. Yesterday the 2 mental health experts were added to the state's witness list.
Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - List of Motions **NO DISCUSSION HERE PLEASE**
Wasn't the whole point of the motion in limine to exclude the mental health experts to keep them from testifying? During the last hearing it was a huge bone of contention .
And now apparently the state has put them on their witness list?:waitasec:
What is going on? Isn't there a risk of them speaking of the very issues that they earlier wanted to keep them quiet about?
This came as quite a surprise to me and I am very curious how this is going to work given that they filed a motion to keep them off the defense witness list.
Here is what I think happened.
These doctors visited with Casey several months ago but found nothing the defense could work with (as Baez learned).
Baez, however, kept this under the belt, BUT continued to "insuinuate" they had something to offer during off the record conversations with SA concerning an offer of a plea agreement under accident scenario. Baez was attempting to be a good poker player and attempting to bluff...
As trial loomed closer, Baez knew he couldn't let these guys be deposed, so he removed them from the defense list, thinking this would prevent SA from finding out what the experts "findings" were...Baez thought he could "cover his bluff" that didn't work?
But JA "one upped him".....placed them on the state witness list and deposed them anyway!
Poor, poor Baez....still learning lessons the hard way! :great:
WOW. Thank you, this is fascinating. So Casey is just a normal,thieving, lying, coldhearted, spiteful young lady, no 'mental health disorders' to be found. Sounds accurate to me.