DawnTCB
Taking Care of Business
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2004
- Messages
- 488
- Reaction score
- 11
So the MR 911 calls were released in their entirety today.
Here's a link
The interesting parts to me were:
1) During call #1 on August 11, MR does not give any contact information, not even his name, to the operator. (He does give a name and number in the 8-12-08 call). I think this is interesting because in the GMA interview he noted regarding the first call:
GMA: And what was the response?
RK: Well, I called that night about 9:30, 10 o'clock. And they said "OK." And then, nothing happened, no one called me back.
I have thought all along that it was odd that he would expect a call back in one day when his tip was so vague. Now to find out he did not leave a number makes me even more curious why he expected such a speedy turnaround. I helped take calls on a tip line for the DC Sniper case and I am somewhat familiar with how they are prioritized, but it would seem to me that most people would not expect a follow-up call in 24 hours. :waitasec: Clearly you could not really expect a return call at all if you didn't actually tell someone your name and number.
2) A fuller description of what he saw was reported in the 2nd call.
MR: I went down and there was, behind one of the trees was a gray, vinyl-like bag, like a pool cover or something like that and it looked rather suspicious. I didn't touch anything. And then a little bit further up you can can tell where someone ran across with a mower but the weeds were still real high in that area. There's a fallen tree that looks like someone had tried to cut on it at one point but there was a white board hanging across the tree and there was something round and white underneath of it.
I think this is interesting because the remains were not in a gray vinyl bag that looked like a pool cover, just your normal black trash bag. It does, however, explain the deputy's description of the bag as gray.
So what do you guys make of this? Anything at all?
Here's a link
The interesting parts to me were:
1) During call #1 on August 11, MR does not give any contact information, not even his name, to the operator. (He does give a name and number in the 8-12-08 call). I think this is interesting because in the GMA interview he noted regarding the first call:
GMA: And what was the response?
RK: Well, I called that night about 9:30, 10 o'clock. And they said "OK." And then, nothing happened, no one called me back.
I have thought all along that it was odd that he would expect a call back in one day when his tip was so vague. Now to find out he did not leave a number makes me even more curious why he expected such a speedy turnaround. I helped take calls on a tip line for the DC Sniper case and I am somewhat familiar with how they are prioritized, but it would seem to me that most people would not expect a follow-up call in 24 hours. :waitasec: Clearly you could not really expect a return call at all if you didn't actually tell someone your name and number.
2) A fuller description of what he saw was reported in the 2nd call.
MR: I went down and there was, behind one of the trees was a gray, vinyl-like bag, like a pool cover or something like that and it looked rather suspicious. I didn't touch anything. And then a little bit further up you can can tell where someone ran across with a mower but the weeds were still real high in that area. There's a fallen tree that looks like someone had tried to cut on it at one point but there was a white board hanging across the tree and there was something round and white underneath of it.
I think this is interesting because the remains were not in a gray vinyl bag that looked like a pool cover, just your normal black trash bag. It does, however, explain the deputy's description of the bag as gray.
So what do you guys make of this? Anything at all?