Cappuccino
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2011
- Messages
- 3,976
- Reaction score
- 3,208
John Mark Byers
Like smart blonde I do believe Jacoby was involved.Especially after reading Amanda's journal.
I have the same questions about the manhole theory as well.Why risk moving the bodies?
IMO the Jacoby residence may have been the original crime scene.
IMO Mr.Bojangles is not related to the crime.There was a lot of drug activity,shootings etc in the area as well.I think Mr,Bojangles may have been involved in any of those incidents more likely than the death of the children....IMO
the bb board is run by Byers?????
I'm not tied into this manhole theory at all. I'm certainly not cherry picking facts to suit it, I'm completely neutral, agnostic on the subject.
Also, totally agree about the unreliability of eyewitness evidence. According to the Innocence Project, 75% of convictions overturned with DNA evidence involved flawed eyewitness statements at the original trial.
The fact still remains - that witness testimony is not the only thing which suggests Stevie went home after his mother went to work. The Ballards, the stomach contents, and the testimony of Pam Hobbs that she left dinner for Stevie consistent with the stomach contents.
The rest of Pam's family also testified about Terry Hobbs doing an awful lot of laundry on the night of May 6th. Maybe the shorts were muddy, and he was washing lots of other stuff as an excuse to throw them in unnoticed?
I was not convince the manhole played a part in the crime scene-until TODAY when I saw the pics of Stevie's inside leg and looked at the rebar pics from the manhole-they matched perfectly in MO-I also think the head wound to Michael looked just like the bottom of the manhole and the wounds to Stevie face looked just like road rash and it looked a lot like the outside of the manhole-the abrasions on Michale's chest also looks like its from the outside of the manhole- thats very compelling evidence to ME-that the manhole played a very big part in the murder.JMOOC
Now-someone please tell me this has been done in the last 18 yrs-the manhole has been Luminol!!
I'm not tied into this manhole theory at all. I'm certainly not cherry picking facts to suit it, I'm completely neutral, agnostic on the subject.
Also, totally agree about the unreliability of eyewitness evidence. According to the Innocence Project, 75% of convictions overturned with DNA evidence involved flawed eyewitness statements at the original trial.
The fact still remains - that witness testimony is not the only thing which suggests Stevie went home after his mother went to work. The Ballards, the stomach contents, and the testimony of Pam Hobbs that she left dinner for Stevie consistent with the stomach contents.
The rest of Pam's family also testified about Terry Hobbs doing an awful lot of laundry on the night of May 6th. Maybe the shorts were muddy, and he was washing lots of other stuff as an excuse to throw them in unnoticed?
did'nt TH say in the Pasdar interview that the night the boys went missing was the first night he ever meet MB or am I wrong..I could have sworn I read that somewhere!
Like smart blonde I do believe Jacoby was involved.Especially after reading Amanda's journal.
I have the same questions about the manhole theory as well.Why risk moving the bodies?
IMO the Jacoby residence may have been the original crime scene.
IMO Mr.Bojangles is not related to the crime.There was a lot of drug activity,shootings etc in the area as well.I think Mr,Bojangles may have been involved in any of those incidents more likely than the death of the children....IMO
I'm a little bothered by the extensive planning attributed to 8-year-olds in CR's account of the "runnning away plan". My idea of running away at that age consisted of conning my grandmother into inviting me for the weekend, or getting on my bike and simply riding (beyond what was allowed) to her house.
I think that heavy wet clothing would actually have aided in keeping the bodies submerged, weighing them down, not causing them to float.I have a thought to share. what if the only reason the kids were undressed and hogtied was solely to keep them hidden underwater as long as possible. If the kids were just placed in the creek the clothing would pull up to the surface. but undressing the kids could certainly aid in keeping them down.
Can you tell me where I can read the journal? I haven't seen that. Thank you in advance