Warwick1991
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2019
- Messages
- 965
- Reaction score
- 7,405
As far as I can remember, Jimmy verified that he gave the weapon to Lonnie for Christmas in 1971 or 72. He also stated the weapon had its serial numbers when it was given which basically threw out Lonnie's story about buying it and finding out the numbers had been scratched. That's when he admitted he'd erased the numbers. I still can't figure out why the cops never pursued that angle. I'm mean, I'm a cop and I've got a suspect that is in possession of the murder weapon of two unidentified individuals and the suspect keeps changing his story. Why didn't they lean on him? Did Lonnie wake up one day and say, hey, I'm going to obliterated the serial numbers on this gun my brother gave me four years ago? It boggles my mind.
I really do believe the cops dropped the ball on this one. It appears that they did their due diligence, putting out feelers all over the country, getting Interpol involved, keeping the bodies in a viewable casket until decomp made that difficult, and Verna..... the woman who relentlessly pursued this case for the rest of her life. What if the investigation was stymied by some insider. Think of all that lost and misplaced evidence. The lack of charges. It just goes on and on. I remember seeing this Italian movie a long time ago, it was called An Investigation of a Citizen Above Suspicion. That citizen was a cop.
The difficult part of the history of the gun is reconciling the various accounts of its history. Newspaper accounts linked on the previous thread say that the gun was stolen from the Raleigh-Durham area in 1974. That puts the 1971-2 “Christmas gift” time frame out of the picture.
I have heard from LE acquaintances that the willingness to prosecute stolen property charges can vary, depending on whether the person found in possession is aware of the fact that the property was stolen. Perhaps it was difficult to prove whether the Henry brothers knew the revolver was stolen.
The obliterated serial number is both a state and Federal crime. The
Federal charges apparently filed against Lonnie suggests that there was reluctance to file state charges by local LE, and that an entity other than the local police had a hand in filing those charges.
So something is wrong here - like the 1970 Italian movie. Incompetence or corruption, or a combination of both.