FullDisclosure
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2008
- Messages
- 561
- Reaction score
- 0
snip*
I don't see how a judge could possibly use speculation, from either side, the public, or even LE to make a decision of such magnitude, especially on behalf of those children. The judge simply would not do that. The judge did the smart thing and sent them to his chambers so they could hash it out themselves rather than dragging all this into the public.
This is my bottom line - none of this was admissable in reality. There was nothing to defend. The only way Brad could defend himself is to prove Nancy was alive - not that he was at a store at a certain time or not at a store at a different time. If he proved Nancy was alive at 7 am - the rest is moot.
My point here is that he felt compelled to defend himself, admissible or not. I would think it would be EXTREMELY difficult to see my name dragged through the mud (even if it were on a message board) and not defend myself. That's all I'm saying.
Wait! There's more!
...to me he looks less guilty by wanting to obtain this info...he's gotta be smart enough to know that they'll check ALL of the tapes, yes? I just gotta think that he wants to prove that he wasn't there at 4:00 (or 4:20 or whatever) buying BLEACH (oops now we're saying detergent).
Maybe I just want to believe him. I don't know why. But if he didn't do this....WOW...I can't even imagine what he's going through...