sunflowers
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2008
- Messages
- 214
- Reaction score
- 0
AND this is exactly where I would tell him to include it! Of all times when he states he got up with a child and tended to her for hours! This is over custody of those children, not the criminal situation he is going to have to address later on!
If there was ever a time he needed to show his love and care for his children it would have been at that moment and stating he got up at 4am!
IMO this a very KEY point that he is wanting to prove to the courts...he wants, tends and deserves his children.
Leaving it out shows he has twisted and lied about his times. This has really hurt him IMO
this is assuming he wanted custody. i don't have enough knowledge to have an opinion, but have gleamed that he seemed to spend little time with the kids prior to April. Also, prior to the end of April, he is said to have been willing for Nancy & the girls to move to Canada.
of course, most of us can't imagine not fighting for custody. i think his problems in July & now are much bigger than custody, and his lawyer's statement of BC being a "mess" (or something similar) was probably very accurate. Might not have interest in custody, and may be totally incapable (emotionally & physically) of providing for the girls right now.
still think there are plenty of inconsistencies & stuff that doesn't come close to adding up. i'm thinking how he's going to extricate himself from this mess is front & center on his mind.
Strange thing, though, is that he's had family members here with him who could certainly have provided help with caring for the girls.
so, regardless of what he might have preferred, the judge clearly believed it was in the best interests of the girls to be with Nancy's family. (I just wonder if that was BC's preference, too....)