I am now going to read all the posts from after I went to bed last night. It seems I have inflamed some people? On message boards, it is very hard to read in "tone", as well as easy to skim, misinterpret and make a hasty bashing of someone else's "perceived" ideas. I will read the posts and comment.
However, I do remember that some people thought I was "calling" JA out for having an affair. NO. All of this began with someone posting a link to DDs blog. Well, I've always had the imorial and the DD blog Art2mis, but don't always read it. SO, I went to mom's link, read a reply that someone had written to DD, saying that "some of the people in our group" (meaning that circle of friends of NC, etc.) had had affairs, two of them." That does not say whether or whom the two were, whether they were one of the group (whether it was a male or female of the group) that went outside the group or had an affair w/someone inside the group.
I don't give a happy rip who got hot with whom in an affair. But the comments I made seemed to be read by "someone else" as saying that *I* thought JA had an affair with Nancy, or Hiller had one with whomever or whatever else people's minds spinned and then blew out here on WS.
Here's what I was trying to say: OK, wonder who those two separate people were? BECAUSE, WHEN LOOKING AT A MURDER, THERE ARE INCIDENTS THAT CAN INFLAME A MURDERER TOWARD THAT MURDER. And then there was the latest aff by Hiller with his remarks, which spurred all of us to interact upon what could it mean?
So, I deduced, COULD any of these affairs have been entertwined into any of the NC murder? Could there have been a piece of that "two people known to have had affairs in the group" entertwined in this case? When affairs happen and become known there is lots of gossip, jealousy and rage depending upon whom is involved. I just took the admission of "two affairs within the group" as another clue to LOOK INTO, as as to what could incite rage, murder, etc.
Well, hell...we don't know. But I was putting it out there. I also put out there that any one of them could have been involved with someone of the same sex, because, yes...that happens too. It's just another "what if". I am not the only one who has said that before here. I am not "bashing" NC or JA or anyone. Get over yourselves, please, if you are part of that.
My thoughts on this are no different than someone else saying, "Well, I KNOW for a fact that BC was here at (wherever) on video." Or, "That is a pole lamp in that brown paper bag", or "Nancy was probably run over by BC in the garage" or "NC was jogging on the side of Holly Springs Rd., then someone took her, killed her and left her on the side of a new development."
It is getting ridiculous. I try to read posts, not skim. Though I do skim at times. But before I bash someone else and call them a basher, I do try to think.
Obviously last night I wasn't thinking clearly when I called Cambridge subdivision out for being Camden Forest. I fixed that error. Geez.
This entire murder is solved already in two people's heads and hearts: the murderer's and Nancy's. Maybe LE's. The rest is not out yet.
Just like with the Civil War. There was not ONE cause leading up to that war of countryman against countryman. There were many issues leading up to it. It took one incident to incite the big explosion into an all out war, with many underlying issues entertwined.
I am suggesting my underlying ideas on WS. I don't believe it requires a separate thread any more than Harris Teeter, BC's affairs, or custody issues have with this case. The road to justice is long and arduous with many side trips toward the destination.
As well, the board is beginning to appear "territorial and heirarchical" among some of the posters. It's everyone's board. We can all co-exist, disagree and discuss underlying issues that we think may have affected or led up to the final blow: murder of NC. It's kind of obvious to me about the WHO DONE IT, in my mind, but I like to know what and all types of issues lead from point A, of being happily married, to point B of affairs, financial discord, lies, (what else?), and finally, a murder.
Anything is possible as we have seen in Nancy's murder. The fact that THAT would ever have happened like what we are seeing is proof that truth (whatever that may be) is stranger than fiction.
IMO, it has nothing to do with it at all. Unless this was a motive for murder, but this is just another reason to suspect Brad. Okay, there is (I suppose) a small chance that this other person could also be a suspect, but there are no SWs or people of interest that we can see at this point.
