Nancy Cooper, 34, of Cary, N.C. #26

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
RUNR
That is one of the best posts so far! This case has been the entire time talking about BC being controlling and what NC was subjected to.

I know that cycle well as much as I try to block it out of my mind since it was 24 years ago I went thru it.
 
Spousal abuse and battery are used for one purpose: to gain and maintain total control over the victim. In addition to physical violence, abusers use the following tactics to exert power over their wives or partners:

Dominance — Abusive individuals need to feel in charge of the relationship. They will make decisions for you and the family, tell you what to do, and expect you to obey without question. Your abuser may treat you like a servant, child, or even as his possession.
Humiliation — An abuser will do everything he can to make you feel bad about yourself, or defective in some way. After all, if you believe you're worthless and that no one else will want you, you're less likely to leave. Insults, name-calling, shaming, and public put-downs are all weapons of abuse designed to erode your self-esteem and make you feel powerless.
Isolation — In order to increase your dependence on him, an abusive partner will cut you off from the outside world. He may keep you from seeing family or friends, or even prevent you from going to work or school. You may have to ask permission to do anything, go anywhere, or see anyone. Source: Domestic Abuse Intervention Project, MN
Threats — Abusers commonly use threats to keep their victims from leaving or to scare them into dropping charges. Your abuser may threaten to hurt or kill you, your children, other family members, or even pets. He may also threaten to commit suicide, file false charges against you, or report you to child services.
Intimidation — Your abuser may use a variety of intimation tactics designed to scare you into submission. Such tactics include making threatening looks or gestures, smashing things in front of you, destroying property, hurting your pets, or putting weapons on display. The clear message is that if you don't obey, there will be violent consequences.
Denial and blame — Abusers are very good at making excuses for the inexcusable. They will blame their abusive and violent behavior on a bad childhood, a bad day, and even on the victims of their abuse. Your abuser may minimize the abuse or deny that it occurred. He will commonly shift the responsibility onto you: Somehow, his violence and abuse is your fault.
If you feel you are in physical danger immediately call 911 or the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 1-800-787-3224.

Cycle of violence
Domestic abuse falls into a common pattern, or cycle of violence:

Abuse — The abuser lashes out with aggressive or violent behavior. The abuse is a power play designed to show the victim "who is boss."
Guilt — After the abusive episode, the abuser feels guilt, but not over what he's done to the victim. The guilt is over the possibility of being caught and facing consequences.
Rationalization or excuses — The abuser rationalizes what he's done. He may come up with a string of excuses or blame the victim for his own abusive behavior—anything to shift responsibility from himself.
"Normal" behavior — The abuser does everything he can to regain control and keep the victim in the relationship. He may act as if nothing has happened, or he may turn on the charm. This peaceful honeymoon phase may give the victim hope that the abuser has really changed this time.
Fantasy and planning — The abuser begins to fantasize about abusing his victim again, spending a lot of time thinking about what she's done wrong and how he'll make her pay. Then he makes a plan for turning the fantasy of abuse into reality.
Set-up — The abuser sets up the victim and puts his plan in motion, creating a situation where he can justify abusing her.
Runr,

I second Mom! Thanks for a fabulous, meaningful (to this discussion) post!
 
Yes, it's a fantastic article and I encourage everyone to learn more about Domestic Violence and the resources available. There's more info from the article Runr shared, including these graphs which illustrates the different types of abuse and how the cycle goes:

im_wheel.gif
im_cycle.gif
 
Between Star, runr & SleuthyGal, we have been educated today in a very big way. I thank all three of you for your important contributions concerning domestic violence. Maybe someone reading these threads will notice themselves, seek help, and break the cycle! Good going, gals!

ETA: So as not to leave anyone out; those of you who have come forward and shared your own experiences living with an abuser/controler, my hats off to you, too. Thank you!
 
All I did was link to an online resource, but those who have personally been on this journey, shared their personal stories with us, and have gotten help/gotten out deserve BIG pats on the back! Perhaps the biggest eye opener is how much is considered 'abuse.' Everything from subtle intimidation to economic control to full-on violence. Most people think physical violence is (only) how abuse is defined. Turns out the umbrella is much larger.
 
All I did was link to an online resource, but those who have personally been on this journey, shared their personal stories with us, and have gotten help/gotten out deserve BIG pats on the back! Perhaps the biggest eye opener is how much is considered 'abuse.' Everything from intimidation to economic control to full-on violence. Most people think violence is how 'abuse' is defined. The umbrella is much larger.
I totally agree!
 
We've heard from a former girlfriend, we've also heard in the affidavits about BC.......it would be interesting to hear co-workers thoughts about BC.......they probably spent more time around him than anyone else.........besides NC.

eta......the people he was going to school with too........wonder how he acted around them?
 
I just asked my husband who has a Blackberry...he hates it, too complicated for a simple person he said. He told me it has all kind of lock features. He said it is possible to lock certain areas (he thinks) such as the address/phone book part, email portion, etc. He said it could be this occured. He has no idea if thisis the case since he hates the phone. His book is at the office he thinks and of course is not willing to go to RTP to get it.

Could it be she had only a portion locked which identified who's who?

Your husband is correct - areas and features can be locked without disturbing the operation as a phone. The phone feature itself may also be locked if one so decides.
 
Your husband is correct - areas and features can be locked without disturbing the operation as a phone. The phone feature itself may also be locked if one so decides.

Thanks RC - good to know. The online documentation that we looked at earlier for the Pearl would suggest it's an 'all or nothing' setting, but perhaps you have firsthand knowledge? [ We were thinking maybe it's an "undocumented" feature to lock out others from your text-messages/contacts vs still allow use of the phone to anyone who happens to grab your device ]

If you're sure, that's good enough for me... if not 100%, I can try to confirm with some of my crackberry wielding friends...
 
Between Star, runr & SleuthyGal, we have been educated today in a very big way. I thank all three of you for your important contributions concerning domestic violence. Maybe someone reading these threads will notice themselves, seek help, and break the cycle! Good going, gals!

ETA: So as not to leave anyone out; those of you who have come forward and shared your own experiences living with an abuser/controler, my hats off to you, too. Thank you!

ICAM - Great work to all!! And as a side note if a couple is married and there's any reason to be concerned about abuse, a copy of the marriage license should be carried in the wallet (of the abused spouse) at all times. Can make a difference between being allowed to stay in your home or being forced to leave (if LE is called that is). ;)
 
Hey, I'm new here and this may not be in the right place, but here goes.

In the surveillance tapes of Brad in Harris Teeter did anyone notice he had on sneakers coming in on the first tape and in the second tape he had on some kind of sandals.

Has this been discussed?
 
Good to have a new perspective on the board, Closet. Yes, it has been discussed. The actual photo is around on different places on the threads. Did you notice the main index page for Nancy's forums? (It's now divided into so many topics that I can't tell you where I've seen that. And, everyone goes off topic in the sub-divided threads, so it's still a jumble of where to find things.)There's also a "photos, no discussion" thread for photos of NC related case.

If you don't already know, scroll up to top of this page, very top, click on the underlined Nancy Cooper, and it will lead you to the index page. Have fun.
 
Mahmoo, your cow with human juicy red lips gives me a shudder every time I see it!:yuck::crosseyed::yow::cow::cow::cow:
 
Hey, I'm new here and this may not be in the right place, but here goes.

In the surveillance tapes of Brad in Harris Teeter did anyone notice he had on sneakers coming in on the first tape and in the second tape he had on some kind of sandals.

Has this been discussed?

Welcome closetcsi!!:)

I believe that you will find that discussion in the WTH are Brad's Lawyers up to now thread (first thread), if I am correct. I think it is near the beginning of the thread and would match the date that the lawyers put the video on the site. You can find the correct date by matching it with the media article located in the media thread at the top. There is also an advanced search function.

We would love to hear your thoughts!
 
Hey, I didn't say to get rid of the lips. They are freaking weird, that's all. Scary, in fact, and funny.:biggrin:
 
WELCOME ClosetCSI!

At the top of each page on the blue bar underneath your username you'll find a SEARCH button. You can search for any keyword and a list of results will be displayed. There are Advanced search functions too. It's a great way to find out if something has been mentioned already or if you're trying to find something you saw before but can't remember where. Sure beats having to remember! :smile:
 
Thanks, I actually did find the thread. Other very interesting differences noted also.

Before coming here I thought about the 4:00 am statement saying that both he and Nancy got up to attend to Bella?

Also noted that bed linens were taken out of the house via the search warrant.

My first thought was that Bella wet the bed. NC got up and woke BC up, he got PO about the bed wetting and that lead to heated argument. NC walked away, went into her bathroom, started to remove her sports bra and that's when he came up behind her and snapped. She couldn't have had much arm movement b/c of the sports bra entanglment, but she was able to get a scratch or to in. I then think he moved her to a bed (with his hands still on her neck) and finally smothered her.
 
The one thing that keeps coming to mind is Lochmere lake. Why were the divers put in the lake immediately? This lake in Lochmere is NOT the one that had the jogging trail around it, but has homes surrounding it. The lake with the jogging trail did not have divers put in it from what I understand.

Have we had all the affidavits released by the LE and who was present on July 12th when the LE was called to the home? Why did they go Sunday morning to the lake while a search was being formed by the community? What did the LE learn that has not been revealed? I find this unusual to jump into the water, before the trails have been totally searched.

Sure we all have our reasons to believe why this was done, but for me something gave them a reason to call this team in. If it was one of the homes on the lake and a child was last seen in the back yard before they dissappeared, YES, call them in now, but an adult who can come and go, who wanted a divorce, physically fit, search the lake 1st? I still think something led them there we might not know of yet.

This is just one of the why's and what's we have. This one is mine.
 
Mom, I'd forgotten about the lake search. Didn't they do Lake Wheeler too, or am I hallucinating? I can think of different reasons, but the whole thing doesn't fit into my reasoning yet. Dont'cha just hate not knowing all the details? I do.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
189
Guests online
577
Total visitors
766

Forum statistics

Threads
608,438
Messages
18,239,455
Members
234,369
Latest member
Anasazi6
Back
Top