Anyone take notice, Baez is no longer saying, if they had the evidence, they would charge her. He went to great lengths to try and convince AND mislead us that LE's case is nothing but smoke and mirrors. So, Jose' Baez, what say you now? Does this mean that Casey is guilty? You can't eat your cake and have it too.
All the CDA's on Nancy's show haven't said it since the announcement has come down, either. I realize they're playing the devil's advocate, but I certainly wouldn't want the vast majority of them representing me. I wouldn't want an attorney who is going to totally ignore the evidence (Mark Geragos anyone). I want one that is going to take the evidence, and use what's known to try and guide me to the best possible defense available. Otherwise, I don't need a trial 'cause jurors aren't that stupid. If this is my only option, I midaswell save the state the expense of a trial.
We knew all along it was they who were tossing out the smoke and mirrors.