First, let me preface my comments by stating that it is my OPINION that Erica is no longer living and most likely perished at the hands of her adoptive parents.
The above-referenced quote has been respectfully snipped and bolded by me.
The bolded portion of the quote is what baffles me also.
By all accounts, CP did not like Erica, treated her poorly, even to the point of allegedly abusing her, and being unreasonable in punishing her.
CarP reportedly attempted to have contact with Erica but was rebuffed by CP.
If CP had such negative feelings towards Erica, and CarP was interested in having a relationship with Erica, then why didn't CP allow CarP to maintain/establish a relationship with Erica, or even allow CarP to regain custody of Erica?
It seems to me that relinquishing a few hundred dollars a month would be much more humane and sensible than having a potential murder charge, plus all of the related charges, (such as relate to the alleged abuse and the financial crimes) hanging over one's head. This doesn't even take into account the potential of spending years and years locked up within the confines of a state and/or federal prison upon conviction of said crimes.
Was it only because of the money that CP and SP were receiving for retaining custody of Erica and not wanting to lose that income that Erica and CarP were not permitted to associate with one another?
What other reason(s) could there be that CP would disallow CarP and Erica to have any contact?