The guardians of Jack and Sarah want the images removed papers are taking pictures off the profile . They are open for anybody to download . She has been asked to put her profile private she says she won't in case the children are looking for her . I doubt they will but even if they did she doesn't need to have a pictures up with big long stories in my opinion, by reading her profile you would think she was a single parent and Jason wasn't involved at all which is not true
I can understand your concern.
But I'll offer you one bit of consolation. After my interest in this case was piqued by one or two newspaper articles here in the US, I went to Molly's FB page. This was BEFORE she was charged.
I immediately noticed that she had edited out all her previous life with Jason and the children. That seemed very strange and very suspicious. Those would be the moments BEFORE she knew what the future held. Why would she need to hide them? The only reason would be that following her REAL life as she presented it on FB in those days...would contradict the fake life she was now trying to sell to the public as a cover story. (Interestingly, after she was charged, several news outlets mentioned her FB as being useful to police who investigated. THEY would be able to access it ALL.)
The long pleas to let the children contact her...along with her phone number...made it seem to me that she was desperate to try to influence what they told the police about her. She NEEDED to talk to them to get them "in line" with her story. The long "reminders" of her cookie baking, "mothering"...seemed to me to try to leverage the children..."See, sometimes I was good."
She repeatedly tries to hint that the Irish relatives were turning the children against her. Here the police were FAR ahead of her. They had experts interview the children very soon after the tragedy. I'm sure those interviews were recorded. She needs the children to back up her "abuse excuse." No jury is going to believe that this abuse would never ever have been witnessed by the children who lived in that house. Any "stories" from her relatives who live out of state...are just them repeating Molly. Same with friends. In other words, Molly has no witnesses and that conpounds the fact that a man lay dead, beaten over and over with brick and bat, and neither she nor her Dad had a scratch on them.
"Please, please let them talk to me!" becomes not the cry of a stepmother but a manipulator...trying to control what she cannot control.
The other odd thing about her FB page, in my opinion, is her Mother. Who would ever guess that Seecu had seen the bloodied corpse that was the handiwork of her husband and daughter....the result of THEIR heinous lack of control...their OVERKILL..and her only reaction to all this...is to want two small children back in their clutches! It's downright frightening! What if, in his teenage years, Jason's son upsets Molly. Is she going to get the bat and brick again? All those years of her husband's training in the FBI, and he has to OVERKILL a man...to stop a situation. In his trial they should compare these two, EVEN IF THEIR STORY WAS TRUE, to police who shoot a jaywalker 15 times to "stop" him.
Except, there is no physical evidence to back up their lies. This is why they are charged.
Molly's FB support probably comes mainly from the organization she joined whose members raise funds for truly abused wives. She "used" them as she "used" Jason. After the autopsy results, I'm sure many have doubts now. Wait till the trial. She will be a pariah.
Take heart that if you are unable to get Facebook to take down those pictures, that many will see in that Facebook page, a far, far different Molly and Seecu, then they are hoping to portray. They are seeing travel, vacations, expensive clothes, party balloons in the background, a beautiful home. They can now read the autopsy results and see what Molly and her Father did to man who made that life possible for her.
