Quite honestly, at this point in time an awareness is arising in me that she cares nothing at all for those children
They are a mere distraction, a red herring so that nobody points the finger and says quite simply- DID YOU DO THAT TO JASON?
She is largely successful in this tactic.. even her lawyer stated it upsets her more than her murdered husband.. sure, nice try.
But wasn't Molly about to swan off into the sunset with an old love she had rediscovered on facebook? What happened to that?
I got a sense reading posts today that maybe we should consider refraining from discussing the children here?
They are vulnerable and their images have been overly exploited in an effort to both extort revenge on the Lynches (legally appointed Guardians) and to distract as many people as possible from the chief case?
I dont think it needs to be a hard and fast rule, but maybe if we became conscious that these discussions are a permanent record and those children should be supported and their privacy respected.
The custody case may intersperse our discussions but I'm not sure we should discuss it here?
I really dont mean to be lecturing and I would appreciate feedback on this notion, which could well be no more than me being over sensitive for their welfare.. (I can be like that and its often irrational)
What do people think?
Actually that may be very good advice Kitty. I think some recent posters may have attempted to move the discussion away from sleuthing and more towards the custody battle which is done and dusted. I am not for one moment suggesting that this was done with an agenda in mind, but it did tend to distract attention from the elements that are relevant to the murder case. I for one am happy to avoid bringing the children into the discussion if at all possible.