emmalpage81
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2016
- Messages
- 580
- Reaction score
- 440
Has anyone any info on when jury selection is starting? I would have thought this week if trial is starting the following week?
I check in on it every now and then. For a long time the posts concerning the children had been hidden and not public. I just thought it was interesting that they are public again after so long.I don't think it has been opened up; seems the same post she left for public viewing. One thing that does confuse me is the number of people saying how much they look like her. Do they not realise they are not her biological children. If they do, that is IMO a very strange comment to make.
All IMO
I check in on it every now and then. For a long time the posts concerning the children had been hidden and not public. I just thought it was interesting that they are public again after so long.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
I use the word nanny ,whether she saw herself as an au pair,childminder,or future mother i dont know.
Her duties were to bring the kids to and from creche and do the cleaning .as quoted by jason's brother ..
Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
Creche is nursery school...[bbm]
what is 'creche'?
Yes we came across this before and I thought it odd apparently Jason and Shannons husband Charlie were good friends and there was a little friction in the household . Also the lawyer can't remember her name now but her husband is in the video with Jason having beers on the JFJ page video tributeView attachment 119628
Meadowlands swim team sign up. Note the board members. (Jason Corbett - A man who allegedly never got involved in his children's activities) -MM
Molly Martens (who claims she was A DV victim by JC)
And interestingly wasn't Ms Grubb the enthusiastic witness for MM recently in court.
This merely makes me ask the question, if I was so sure my friend was being physically abused by a man or in fact I was the victim would I have him involved in a children's swim team ? Would I sit with him in meetings at sign up day, organise events, host events. All the other instances that would require working together when your part of an organisation such as this ....... I think not.
Moo
Sent from my SM-T561 using Tapatalk
Don't understand it. Is it just a case of wisteria lane syndrome? Why are these ladies so obviously wearing blinders when it comes to evidence so farYes we came across this before and I thought it odd apparently Jason and Shannons husband Charlie were good friends and there was a little friction in the household . Also the lawyer can't remember her name now but her husband is in the video with Jason having beers on the JFJ page video tribute
as far as i can recall it was mm cousin amanda mui that put up the inflammatory post about jc not emm
interesting find
http://m.independent.ie/irish-news/...-was-violent-or-a-heavy-drinker-34355748.htmlEly Martens also took issue with Ms Lynch's characterisation of an alleged incident at Ms Martens's wedding.It was claimed by Ms Lynch that Ms Martens argued with her husband and threw her bridesmaid and parents out of her wedding after becoming upset when a young guest at the banquet got a McDonald's meal because they were allergic to egg whites. Ely Martens accepted that her sister-in-law had been upset about this. However, she said it was incorrect to suggest anyone had been asked to leave the wedd
Yes I think your right it was Amanda ss attached she also was arrested for fraud .. Ely gave an interview to the Independent she disputed that somebody was thrown out of the wedding but admitted Molly got upset about a bridesmaid having an allergy to the food and going to Mac Donald's
http://m.independent.ie/irish-news/...-was-violent-or-a-heavy-drinker-34355748.html
I also wanted to get your opinion on Mm posts. I always found it at the least insensitive she shared these two images especially given that she claimed she was posting to get messages to J & S or in the hope they might be looking at her page .
It seems certain that most of MMs and her familys posts could be considered inconsiderate, self-serving, and inappropriate depending on your perspective. Not sure what I am seeing in regards to the black leather like cover with JCs name written out. Is it a bat cover? Have for so long wanted to know if the bat that was used to kill J was brought the night of his death during the unexpected visit from his in-laws. If so, what is the implication? If not, and the bat was already in the house, what is the implication? Yes, now that I have thought about it, these posts most definitely might be meant to send not so subtle messages that could without a doubt intimidate those who loved J the most, his children and family. Breaks my heart to even consider that Js children might be denied the simple pleasure of a baseball game which so many young and old enjoy without always being reminded of the damage done with a baseball bat that the perps admitted was used to kill their father. Not just any bat, but a bat that was supposedly gifted to Js son earlier or was brought the night of the murder but not yet gifted. Regardless, horrific, to think that anyone would place such a heavy load on such innocent young lives. Cold chills; they chose a weapon that ME stated was a childs bat as if that could ever mitigate the damage to J and those who loved him. Heinous doesnt come close. The teddy bear posts without a doubt makes it perfectly clear that Js children were denied even the most basic personal comfort after their fathers homicide, their favorite stuffed animal. There is no excuse or post that can ameliorate the pain caused beyond losing their father, it is absolutely heartbreaking. They lost everything even their favorite stuffed animal. Imagine losing your father, home, friends, bed, and everything from your everyday life. Then having someone posting your things, home, stuffed animals, clothes, toys, dog, and everything you are certain to mourn but never once posting the most important one, that their father loved them. Not one post that acknowledges that Js children will and should miss him. Not one post that acknowledges what J did for his children. What is wrong with this picture? What is missing? If I missed MM or her family posting or acknowledging a single positive thing J offered them or his children, then please let me know. Looking at MMs posts, it is quite obvious that someone provided an extraordinary life, beautiful children, beautiful home, and many holidays. It is quite obvious; to do so, meant that someone had a full time job, loved his children and family to make such a tremendous sacrifice. Appears that J was selfless in his eternal effort in trying to make everyone happy. He even assured that his children were protected in the event of his death. What more could you ask of a father? I am crying now.
It seems certain that most of MMs and her familys posts could be considered inconsiderate, self-serving, and inappropriate depending on your perspective. Not sure what I am seeing in regards to the black leather like cover with JCs name written out. Is it a bat cover? Have for so long wanted to know if the bat that was used to kill J was brought the night of his death during the unexpected visit from his in-laws. If so, what is the implication? If not, and the bat was already in the house, what is the implication? Yes, now that I have thought about it, these posts most definitely might be meant to send not so subtle messages that could without a doubt intimidate those who loved J the most, his children and family. Breaks my heart to even consider that Js children might be denied the simple pleasure of a baseball game which so many young and old enjoy without always being reminded of the damage done with a baseball bat that the perps admitted was used to kill their father. Not just any bat, but a bat that was supposedly gifted to Js son earlier or was brought the night of the murder but not yet gifted. Regardless, horrific, to think that anyone would place such a heavy load on such innocent young lives. Cold chills; they chose a weapon that ME stated was a childs bat as if that could ever mitigate the damage to J and those who loved him. Heinous doesnt come close. The teddy bear posts without a doubt makes it perfectly clear that Js children were denied even the most basic personal comfort after their fathers homicide, their favorite stuffed animal. There is no excuse or post that can ameliorate the pain caused beyond losing their father, it is absolutely heartbreaking. They lost everything even their favorite stuffed animal. Imagine losing your father, home, friends, bed, and everything from your everyday life. Then having someone posting your things, home, stuffed animals, clothes, toys, dog, and everything you are certain to mourn but never once posting the most important one, that their father loved them. Not one post that acknowledges that Js children will and should miss him. Not one post that acknowledges what J did for his children. What is wrong with this picture? What is missing? If I missed MM or her family posting or acknowledging a single positive thing J offered them or his children, then please let me know. Looking at MMs posts, it is quite obvious that someone provided an extraordinary life, beautiful children, beautiful home, and many holidays. It is quite obvious; to do so, meant that someone had a full time job, loved his children and family to make such a tremendous sacrifice. Appears that J was selfless in his eternal effort in trying to make everyone happy. He even assured that his children were protected in the event of his death. What more could you ask of a father? I am crying now.
It seems certain that most of MMs and her familys posts could be considered inconsiderate, self-serving, and inappropriate depending on your perspective. Not sure what I am seeing in regards to the black leather like cover with JCs name written out. Is it a bat cover? Have for so long wanted to know if the bat that was used to kill J was brought the night of his death during the unexpected visit from his in-laws. If so, what is the implication? If not, and the bat was already in the house, what is the implication? Yes, now that I have thought about it, these posts most definitely might be meant to send not so subtle messages that could without a doubt intimidate those who loved J the most, his children and family. Breaks my heart to even consider that Js children might be denied the simple pleasure of a baseball game which so many young and old enjoy without always being reminded of the damage done with a baseball bat that the perps admitted was used to kill their father. Not just any bat, but a bat that was supposedly gifted to Js son earlier or was brought the night of the murder but not yet gifted. Regardless, horrific, to think that anyone would place such a heavy load on such innocent young lives. Cold chills; they chose a weapon that ME stated was a childs bat as if that could ever mitigate the damage to J and those who loved him. Heinous doesnt come close. The teddy bear posts without a doubt makes it perfectly clear that Js children were denied even the most basic personal comfort after their fathers homicide, their favorite stuffed animal. There is no excuse or post that can ameliorate the pain caused beyond losing their father, it is absolutely heartbreaking. They lost everything even their favorite stuffed animal. Imagine losing your father, home, friends, bed, and everything from your everyday life. Then having someone posting your things, home, stuffed animals, clothes, toys, dog, and everything you are certain to mourn but never once posting the most important one, that their father loved them. Not one post that acknowledges that Js children will and should miss him. Not one post that acknowledges what J did for his children. What is wrong with this picture? What is missing? If I missed MM or her family posting or acknowledging a single positive thing J offered them or his children, then please let me know. Looking at MMs posts, it is quite obvious that someone provided an extraordinary life, beautiful children, beautiful home, and many holidays. It is quite obvious; to do so, meant that someone had a full time job, loved his children and family to make such a tremendous sacrifice. Appears that J was selfless in his eternal effort in trying to make everyone happy. He even assured that his children were protected in the event of his death. What more could you ask of a father? I am crying now.
I know I have posted about this before, but the paving stone puzzles me. The defendants claim it was already in the bedroom, as it was part of a school project by one of the children. Now, one of the two weapons allegedly used was a childs aluminium baseball bat. The bat in itself, is unlikely IMO to cause the horrific skull fractures, such as the hinge fracture Jason suffered that night, nor (again IMO) would a paving stone that could be wielded in one hand. So, how big is the paving stone? If, to be able to inflict such injuries, it had to be wielded in both hands by someone, would a child be expected to carry such a big and heavy object to and from a school? I would suggest that if the paving stone is as big and heavy as I suspect, it was unlikely to have been part of a school project as the defendants have asserted, and therefore would not have been an object that happened to be in the bedroom already. Do we have any idea of the size and weight of the paving stone?