GUILTY NC - Kathleen Peterson, 48, found dead in her Durham home, 9 Dec 2001

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
What ever became of the copies of his writing? I think those stories alone tell a really interesting insight into the writer. Writers write what they know, and he wrote sex, betrayal and the love of murder.

My thoughts on the weapon? Himself, he grabbed her head and smashed it into the side of doorway.

I also agree the one child is most likely his. I wonder if they ever did a DNA test on those children.
 
I did find a blog which was quite a random collection of snippets from the case, which included emails I hadn't seen before (like the 'lets work on our marriage tonight' email) and that had a few snippets of his articles on the hizzoner.com page. I can't quite seem to find it though.

There is also this blog - but I haven't checked the veracity of the clippings:

HIZZONER OFFENDED: The mad musings of would-be mayor and murder suspect, Michael Peterson

I have to say that as a writer and novelist myself, I don't find the writings on murder particularly worrying. Novelists do have imaginations and we do get a bit frustrated when people presume we base everything on people we know or real circumstances. I am perfectly capable of writing the musings of a serial killer myself - without every hurting anyone.

It's his words when he describes the night itself that interest me more. The random details he finds it necessary to put in, and the things he leaves out.
 
Also, taken from the website I linked to above:

On Forest Hills

June 1, 2001

A week ago, a car was abandoned on the street in back of my home. I knew it didn’t belong to a neighbor but thought it might have broken down, though it was a relatively new Honda Accord and there was no white distress cloth attached. I waited four days before calling the police, though the street on which the car was abandoned is a busy one where cars never park and the police patrol frequently.

When the police arrived—within ten minutes of my call—the officer told me the car was stolen. How much longer would the car have remained "stolen" unless I called the cops? More importantly, as my wife pointed out, what does that say about the safety of our neighborhood if thieves are dropping off stolen cars fifty yards from our front door?


June 25, 2001

WHAT IS GOING ON IN FOREST HILLS?

Seven first-degree burglaries!

**********

When you take this writing, in addition to the one where he says that they had had a home intruder actually in their home, who stole a mobile phone and a laptop, and that this home invasion happened when they were at home, with all the lights on and with cars in the drive...

IS IT NOT REASONABLE TO THINK THAT IF YOU ARE WORRIED ABOUT HOME SECURITY, ON DISCOVERING KATHLEEN'S BODY, YOUR THOUGHTS WOULD NOT AUTOMATICALLY BE A FALL DOWN THE STAIRS, BUT AT THE VERY LEAST, AN INTRUDER WAS POSSIBLE.
 
I caught something in The Staircase showing Michael Peterson gave conflicting stories. Early on, he said Kathleen knew he was bisexual and they would even joke about it. He gave an example of them going to an event that involved being around military men and supposedly Kathleen said something along the lines of "You must love this", hinting at his attraction to those type of men. Then in the last episode Michael Peterson is talking about his bisexuality and says something like "I don't know what Kathleen would have thought about me being bisexual. I think she would have made it work." That sure sounds like she didn't know about it; however his sons said they knew. May I also speculate that Margaret(adopted with her sister Martha)resembled Michael Peterson a lot?
 
I caught something in The Staircase showing Michael Peterson gave conflicting stories. Early on, he said Kathleen knew he was bisexual and they would even joke about it. He gave an example of them going to an event that involved being around military men and supposedly Kathleen said something along the lines of "You must love this", hinting at his attraction to those type of men. Then in the last episode Michael Peterson is talking about his bisexuality and says something like "I don't know what Kathleen would have thought about me being bisexual. I think she would have made it work." That sure sounds like she didn't know about it; however his sons said they knew. May I also speculate that Margaret(adopted with her sister Martha)resembled Michael Peterson a lot?

I interpreted this as Peterson finally admitting, all these years later, that he had lied about being open with Kathleen about his bisexuality.

While I certainly believe what he has to say about the stigma surrounding it, I was disturbed by his offhand manner re his numerous sexual affairs throughout both his marriages, no matter the gender of his partners. These were not open marriages and he knew he was engaging in high risk behavior that potentially exposed Kathleen to STDs, including AIDS, without her consent.

These repeated betrayals were obviously personal choices, though he shifts the blame to society's prejudices (thus perpetuating the myth that bisexual people can't be monogomous), and I wish the filmmaker had pressed him on this aspect of it. I think it would have been very revealing.

This doesn't make him a murderer, of course, and doesn't mean he didn't love Kathleen, but it does go to character - and his ability to rationalize extremely selfish behavior when it suits him.
 
I have been watching "The Staircase" on Netflix. Even though I have followed the case for many years, and know all the details, I am fascinated by the behind the scenes clips of the attorneys and witnesses.
It is very fascinating. When was this filmed? They left the blood still on the stairs? I am slightly confused about the timing of this.
 
I did find a blog which was quite a random collection of snippets from the case, which included emails I hadn't seen before (like the 'lets work on our marriage tonight' email) and that had a few snippets of his articles on the hizzoner.com page. I can't quite seem to find it though.

There is also this blog - but I haven't checked the veracity of the clippings:

HIZZONER OFFENDED: The mad musings of would-be mayor and murder suspect, Michael Peterson

I have to say that as a writer and novelist myself, I don't find the writings on murder particularly worrying. Novelists do have imaginations and we do get a bit frustrated when people presume we base everything on people we know or real circumstances. I am perfectly capable of writing the musings of a serial killer myself - without every hurting anyone.

It's his words when he describes the night itself that interest me more. The random details he finds it necessary to put in, and the things he leaves out.

I too am a writer but feel differently about the way he wrote in particular....it seemed more of a diary than a novel type.
 
I am totally obsessed with this case and have changed my mind many times. But I've finally settled on guilty. If you go back to the first scene of The Staircase, when he is at the pool, recounting their final moments together he says "And that's the last time I saw her alive. Ah.. well no, she was alive.. " etc. I think that's a fairly major slip up.

Also - why all the paper towels? And why "My wife! She's fallen down the stairs!" REALLY? Because most people looking at that scene do NOT immediately think - ah yes, a tumble down the stairs. He himself had written about an intruder/robbery they'd had WHILST AT HOME with all the lights on and with cars on the forecourt. So SURELY, your first thought would be not 'oh clearly fallen down the stairs' but she's been attacked. And why do you say 'She's still breathing'. Why not "Oh my God, she's in a really really bad way - there's so much BLOOD" Why not mention the massive sticky red elephant in the room... the blood!!!!

I think they watched a film together. After that, she left to check her emails. And then didn't come back for quite a time. When he finally realised what was happening, he went to see her and found her incadescent with rage and hurt. She said something like "everyone is going to know what you really are" and he snapped. At first he grabbed her by the throat but she pulled away, trying to dash up the back stairs. He pulled her down and slammed her head once into the skirting board and twice against a step. She passed out and he stood there, horrified. He was certain he'd killed her and went out onto the patio, possibly even down to the pool, pacing and working out what to do - his son would be coming back soon!!!

But he'd seen something like this before - even if he didn't do it - people fall down stairs. So he dashed in and opened another bottle of wine - pouring it down the sink and putting two glasses out. (The cops would smell the alcohol down the sink and note only his finger prints were on the glasses), Then he heads back to the scene and OH MY GOD. Not only is the blood horrific - she's been bleeding out all this time.. SHE'S GETTING UP. Her feet are drenched in her own blood and she's moaning - so he grabs... (what, I don't know - possibly a full coke can) and hits her hard, three or four times, until she's down again.

This is getting really out of control. He has to get rid of the emails. He goes through to the computer and spends sometime trying to hide evidence. He goes outside and buries the item he bludgeoned her with in some woodland. Then he comes running back and decides he'll have to clean up some of the blood - this is way to much blood for her to have fallen down the stairs, even he can see that. But then he's trying to soak it up and there's just so much and he realises it's going to look dodgy if he tries to dispose of the blood soaked paper towels as he wouldn't that if he was trying to get her help. So he abandons the towels - realising he can't carry them anywhere, they'll just have to stay there. First he tries to clean his bloody foot prints up from where he's gone through to the laundry - he takes his shoes off. Christ, what a mess.

After what feels like only 10 minutes, but has probably been over an hour, he steels himself to make the call. He knows people must think he found her ALIVE. And so he calls...

"My wife... she's still breathing".

That's my take on it anyway.
I for one can’t get past all the blood in the staircase. We have steep stairs and at one point or another all four of my children have tumbled down. Not one time did any of them bleed, much less require medical attention. Not one time did any of them have 5 deep lacerations to the head, but no bruising on the legs or buttocks. Secondly, those red nuerons in her brain would not be there unless she had been dead for at least 2 hours. 2 hours is a long time for Michael to clean up, hide stuff, stage the scene and take his shoes and socks off etc. before even calling 911. Then he was checking his emails while his wife was lying there in a pool of blood! Who does that?

The next thing that bothered me is the financial situation they were in. Kathleens job was in jeopardy due to company layoffs. She had a 1.4 million dollar life insurance policy. Michael didn’t produce any income in the last 3 years, They had $140k in credit card debt. According to the sister, this house needed plumbing work & they couldn’t even afford to have basic maintenance done. In addition to their money troubles, the sons were also in a lot of debt that Michael emailed his ex-wife asking her to help them by taking out a home equity loan because he could never ask Kathleen.

So are we supposed to believe that while she was working to keep the bills paid that she was perfectly fine with her husband paying for sex with men that could be exposing her to all kinds of STD’s? It wasn’t just Brad, there were others. I’m sorry, but she doesn’t strike me as the kind of woman who would put up with that. In fact, she divorced her first husband for infidelity.

So I guess I’m saying I’m all in for a guilty verdict. Ha! To me, you have to look at the big picture. I think he is a complete narcissistic sociopath. He’s laughing making jokes to his daughter saying “you’re next”! He was the one who hired the film crew. He loved the stage he had and thought he was smart enough to get away with it.
 
I interpreted this as Peterson finally admitting, all these years later, that he had lied about being open with Kathleen about his bisexuality.

While I certainly believe what he has to say about the stigma surrounding it, I was disturbed by his offhand manner re his numerous sexual affairs throughout both his marriages, no matter the gender of his partners. These were not open marriages and he knew he was engaging in high risk behavior that potentially exposed Kathleen to STDs, including AIDS, without her consent.

These repeated betrayals were obviously personal choices, though he shifts the blame to society's prejudices (thus perpetuating the myth that bisexual people can't be monogomous), and I wish the filmmaker had pressed him on this aspect of it. I think it would have been very revealing.

This doesn't make him a murderer, of course, and doesn't mean he didn't love Kathleen, but it does go to character - and his ability to rationalize extremely selfish behavior when it suits him.
In regards to the STD...I watched The Staircase with subtitles on. There was a muffled conversation between Peterson and Rudolf in the courtroom (during the hearing about the Alford Plea). Peterson said something like "Where were you when I served in Vietnam, haha?" Rudolf replied, "I was in school and trying to avoid STDs, that was my Vietnam, haha". Peterson said, "Did you win, haha?" and Rudolf laughed and said, "No, haha." This led me to believe that Peterson and Rudolf had some kind of inside joke about STDs. I am not quoting their exact words, just from my memory. If not watching with subtitles on I would not have been able to read their whispered conversation. The filmmaker was extremely lenient when it came to the affairs....even Peterson wouldn't call his indiscretions "affairs" because there was no relationship involved.
 
During the case on The Staircase, they mention a case (I believe in Canada) where a man served several years for his wife falling down the stairs and then it was overturned? I remember something similar to this a while back and wonder if it is the same case. I'm remembering a recreation that had been done to show that the woman fell from the top stair and literally fell through the air all the way to the bottom and landed on top of her head. Or something like that. TIA
 
I don't. As an interesting side-note, the man who proposed the owl theory grew up in the house he still lives in now, next door or two doors away from the Peterson residence. His father, Forrest Alford Pollard, murdered a man in 1960. The man he murdered is buried in the same cemetery as Kathleen Peterson.

Statesville Record And Landmark from Statesville, North Carolina on April 25, 1960 · Page 1


"Durham Banker Is Fatally Shot DURHAM <UP1> &#8212; Di.st. Sol. William Murdock planned to ask the Durham County grand jury today to indict Forrest Pollard on first &#8226; degree murder charges in the fatal shooting of Charles S. Allen, prominent Durham bank er. Allen was shot twice at his home shortly after a party to which he escorted Pollards former wife. He fell dead on the porch of his home, according to Murdock. when the second charge from a 12-gauge shotgun struck his left side and abdomen. Pollard, a 53 - year &#8226; old attorney and former state legislator was arrested at his home about 30 minutes after the shooting. Officers said they recovered a gun there which they thought was used in the shooting. According to Murdock, Allen and Mrs. Pollard were sitting in Allen's home with the victim's housekeeper when Pollard rang the door bell. Pollard and Allen exchanged words, the solicitor said, and then went outside. He quoted Mrs. Virginia Pitchford, Allen's housekeeper, as saying she heard shots and ran to the door. She found Allen staggering up to the porch, saying Pollard had shot him. Allen, a fiO - year &#8226; old Weldon native, was president of the Citizens National Bank until it merged recently with the Durham Bank and Trust Co. He was serving as senior vice president of the Durham Bank &&#8226; Trust Co. at the time of his death. He was president of the Durham Baseball Club in the Carolina League and a member of the State Board of Conservation and Development. Funeral services were at 2 p.m. today at Duke I'Diversity Chapel with burial in Maplewood Cemetery."

His middle name was Alford? Seriously? Alford! The irony!
 
OK....I am rewatching STAIRCASE on netflix. Something still bothers me. The police stating the blood was dry. Blood dries much quicker than you would imagine, and that's partly why it is so hard to clean up. I don't believe you can tell how long a person has been down by the blood being dried. I mean, it dries in minutes in the hospital when a patient is bleeding onto the floor. and again, there is all the murkiness about his being bisexual and looking for encounters. Still, does not make him a murderer. I staunchly believed him guilty, based on the previous death, based on sentiment, based on all of the reasons put forth by the prosecution. Now, I'm not so sure. There were no marks on Peterson. No doubt, Kathleen would have fought for her life, she certainly sounds like a very capable and strong willed person. I still wonder if she surprised an intruder. How well did they look for one? After they jumped on the "husband as perp" bandwagon, did they stop any further forensic investigation? Now, let me ask you this....if you knew police would be going through your computer, would you try to delete anything? Since you are here on this forum, you are probably, like many of us, a true crime aficionado (spelling?). So, have you ever searched for a poison, a drug, a murder? What would that look like to an investigator in the event of a mysterious death of someone close to you? I'm just sayin'....
As a long time member of this site (although I've been off for a while) I'd be screwed!
 
I too am a writer but feel differently about the way he wrote in particular....it seemed more of a diary than a novel type.
I though they'd just found random paragraphs in various half finished manuscripts etc? I don't recall a mention of it being first person. But I'll watch that bit again and see if I can make more sense of it.
 
I re-watched the first five or so episodes a few days ago before turning to the last three. There was something I missed the first time I watched the film and I don't think I have seen this reported anywhere else. When Rudolph and his PI were talking to Peterson about his sexuality and, in particular, trying to impress on him that it probably wasn't going to work for him to just flat-out deny that he'd had sex with men, they mentioned that a man had claimed to have had been sleeping with Peterson. The man's name was Dennis Rowe. Here's the weird thing. Dennis grew up with Kathleen in Pennsylvania, and even stranger, he was murdered in Durham (where he lived) three years after Kathleen: Tragic twist: Childhood friends here killed in N.C. 3 yeears apart

Here's another tidbit I picked up locally: some suspected that the younger son knew more than he let on, arrived before the police and left, and that he's the one who disposed of the murder weapon.
 
I re-watched the first five or so episodes a few days ago before turning to the last three. There was something I missed the first time I watched the film and I don't think I have seen this reported anywhere else. When Rudolph and his PI were talking to Peterson about his sexuality and, in particular, trying to impress on him that it probably wasn't going to work for him to just flat-out deny that he'd had sex with men, they mentioned that a man had claimed to have had been sleeping with Peterson. The man's name was Dennis Rowe. Here's the weird thing. Dennis grew up with Kathleen in Pennsylvania, and even stranger, he was murdered in Durham (where he lived) three years after Kathleen: Tragic twist: Childhood friends here killed in N.C. 3 yeears apart

Here's another tidbit I picked up locally: some suspected that the younger son knew more than he let on, arrived before the police and left, and that he's the one who disposed of the murder weapon.
Wow - interesting.

I've been rewatching it again too, and there's an interesting scene when one of the sons is talking to him in his study. He's there with his pipe, pontificating and going on about the arrogance of youth fading in age... and his son just stares at him for a bit, with this really really weird look and you just think.... he's wondering, isn't he. I wonder if he knew all along.

The Dennis Rowe thing is really peculiar - another death close to Mike - though of course he'd have been in prison at that point.
 
I re-watched the first five or so episodes a few days ago before turning to the last three. There was something I missed the first time I watched the film and I don't think I have seen this reported anywhere else. When Rudolph and his PI were talking to Peterson about his sexuality and, in particular, trying to impress on him that it probably wasn't going to work for him to just flat-out deny that he'd had sex with men, they mentioned that a man had claimed to have had been sleeping with Peterson. The man's name was Dennis Rowe. Here's the weird thing. Dennis grew up with Kathleen in Pennsylvania, and even stranger, he was murdered in Durham (where he lived) three years after Kathleen: Tragic twist: Childhood friends here killed in N.C. 3 yeears apart

Here's another tidbit I picked up locally: some suspected that the younger son knew more than he let on, arrived before the police and left, and that he's the one who disposed of the murder weapon.

Was that the same son that found the blow poke many years later in a garage that had been previously searched .
 
Was that the same son that found the blow poke many years later in a garage that had been previously searched .

Yes - and who MP was very clear wouldn't be believed in court due to a very long rap sheet. However, there was absolutely no blood on that blow poke, I honestly don't think it was the weapon. I think the triad shaped wound was caused by her head being slammed into the corner of the skirting boards the middle mark being the corner of the wall. If he hit her with anything other than the wall and stairs, I think it may have been something small, heavy and palm shaped - which meant there was no cast-off as his own hand shielded it. Just a theory.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
116
Guests online
1,733
Total visitors
1,849

Forum statistics

Threads
599,579
Messages
18,097,057
Members
230,887
Latest member
DeeDee214
Back
Top