I realize this is a very old post, but I just had to quote it because I agree so completely. Yes, MacDonald is a creep a liar and cheater none of which prove he is a murderer. But to me, you can exlude every other fact, the blood evidence proves he did it. It was fortunate, an very unusual, that they all had separate blood types since DNA was but a distant dream when this crime was committed. He did it. I don't have one tiny inkling of a doubt.
Also, I have always found the silmilarities to Darlie's case interesting. In both cases the overkill of two children who could not possibly have posed a threat to an intruder. But two kids could certainly pose a threat if they saw daddy stabbing mommy (the MacDonald case, of course).
Intruders don't bring weapons into the house, but then leave them behind and don't leave one bit of evidence that they were ever in thehouse?
One other thing that has always struck me that I never really see mentioned. So these intruders break in apparently unarmed, because they use weapons already in the house. Yet when they leave, why on earth do they leave said weapons behind? I mean, what crazed intruder couldn't use an extra knife, club or icepick? What if someone is pursuing them - you know like the big strong Green Beret they just attacked - and they need to defend themselves? The only thing the weapon can do is further incriminate them as it could have their fingerprints, fibers from their clothes any number of things and DNA in Darlie's case-that was a couple of years after the OJ trial everyone had heard of DNA. So why not take the weapons with them?
Oh yeah, I know. There were no intruders
