Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
bbmMcDonald has lived his entire life believing his own lies. He has a convincing story, that is compelling because he is a manipulative psychopath who is seductive and charismatic with his tale of woe.
Not buying the ticket for this ride.
Ran across this tonight. Can't believe there will be yet another show about this.
'A Wilderness of Error' Trailer Revisits the Jeffrey MacDonald Triple-Murder Case 40 Years Later (Video)
FX has set a premiere date for the docuseries "A Wilderness of Error," based on the book of the same name by Errol Morris.
The series from producers Marc Smerling and Jason Blum, producers of HBO's "The Jinx" dives into the story of Army surgeon Jeffrey MacDonald, who was sent to prison for killing his family amid a storm of swirling narratives. Per FX, the series "challenges our very ability to find the truth all the while overshadowing a chilling possibility: MacDonald may be an innocent man."
There really won’t beI will still probably check it out, but with 30 years on this case, it does not change my mind about his guilt. Sure that there won't be anything new.
Satch
the defence put forward the fact there was candle wax in the home that could not be traced to any candles in the home,
yet the investigators let the trash be taken and didn't search it , the said remains of candles could therefore have been disposed of then or weeks previously, the candle wax doesnt prove intruders were there.
In my opinion this man should be allowed to some new DNA tests.
I mean we have new technologies now.
He could be innocent who knows? In 1970 nobody was able to testing DNA
This is a great summary of the damning evidence against him. Another I would add is the discrepancy in brutal violence directed at the murder victims and the injuried he received. In my experience as a true crime buff, when everyone else is the victim of a tremendous level of violence and the one person who magically got away isn't, that doesn't add up.Hi Waller,
I also used to think that McDonald was innocent. Actually followed this case for about forty years and write papers from both prosecution and defense viewpoints! The biggest problems with his innocence are:
1.) There is too much inconsistency with McDonald's statements and what was found at the crime scene.
2.) MacDonald's stuttering and stammering during all of those early interviews show that he is hiding something. "This guy throws a hell of a punch" when describing the alleged attack on him. I mean, who says something like that?
3.) He goes on Dick Cavett and only talks about the botched investigation, does not once even mention the "intruders" until Cavett prompts him.
4.) The jury said that McDonald's own demeanor on the stand and strong arrogance hurt him, terribly.
5.) That living room is too neat to make his story believable.
6.) Where did Helena and her friends get these candles and when did they light them if you believe his intruder story? It was raining outside at the time, and the candle wick would have been wet, making the candle impossible to light
.
7.) If a flashlight was used, and intruders were there, how did they know the dark house so well, and knowing exactly that MacDonald would be on the couch, and the kids in their beds upon entering?
8.) On drugs or not, who is stupid enough to enter the home of a medically trained Green Barret, his pregnant wife, and three little girls thinking that they are going to win a fight against him?
9.) Why were none of these intruders not even injured in the slightest during the alleged struggle? Prosecutor Jim Blackburn said that "If MacDonald's story were true, one of those people (at least) would be dead from him fighting with them during the struggle." I say, maybe not dead, but at least very badly injured.
10.) How are all these people able to fight in such a small space in that living room? There was only about 4-6 feet between the couch and the coffee table where all of this took place.
11.) Look at the magazines, newspapers, neatly stacked underneath the overturned table. If there was a fight in the living room, the living room would look like the slaughter house that was found in the bedrooms, where the evidence shows all the fighting and horror took place.
Satch
Hi Waller,
I also used to think that McDonald was innocent. Actually followed this case for about forty years and write papers from both prosecution and defense viewpoints! The biggest problems with his innocence are:
1.) There is too much inconsistency with McDonald's statements and what was found at the crime scene.
2.) MacDonald's stuttering and stammering during all of those early interviews show that he is hiding something. "This guy throws a hell of a punch" when describing the alleged attack on him. I mean, who says something like that?
3.) He goes on Dick Cavett and only talks about the botched investigation, does not once even mention the "intruders" until Cavett prompts him.
4.) The jury said that McDonald's own demeanor on the stand and strong arrogance hurt him, terribly.
5.) That living room is too neat to make his story believable.
6.) Where did Helena and her friends get these candles and when did they light them if you believe his intruder story? It was raining outside at the time, and the candle wick would have been wet, making the candle impossible to light
.
7.) If a flashlight was used, and intruders were there, how did they know the dark house so well, and knowing exactly that MacDonald would be on the couch, and the kids in their beds upon entering?
8.) On drugs or not, who is stupid enough to enter the home of a medically trained Green Barret, his pregnant wife, and three little girls thinking that they are going to win a fight against him?
9.) Why were none of these intruders not even injured in the slightest during the alleged struggle? Prosecutor Jim Blackburn said that "If MacDonald's story were true, one of those people (at least) would be dead from him fighting with them during the struggle." I say, maybe not dead, but at least very badly injured.
10.) How are all these people able to fight in such a small space in that living room? There was only about 4-6 feet between the couch and the coffee table where all of this took place.
11.) Look at the magazines, newspapers, neatly stacked underneath the overturned table. If there was a fight in the living room, the living room would look like the slaughter house that was found in the bedrooms, where the evidence shows all the fighting and horror took place.
Satch
The DNA evidence came back as his no one else.In my opinion this man should be allowed to some new DNA tests.
I mean we have new technologies now.
He could be innocent who knows? In 1970 nobody was able to testing DNA
Hi Waller,
I also used to think that McDonald was innocent. Actually followed this case for about forty years and write papers from both prosecution and defense viewpoints! The biggest problems with his innocence are:
1.) There is too much inconsistency with McDonald's statements and what was found at the crime scene.
2.) MacDonald's stuttering and stammering during all of those early interviews show that he is hiding something. "This guy throws a hell of a punch" when describing the alleged attack on him. I mean, who says something like that?
3.) He goes on Dick Cavett and only talks about the botched investigation, does not once even mention the "intruders" until Cavett prompts him.
4.) The jury said that McDonald's own demeanor on the stand and strong arrogance hurt him, terribly.
5.) That living room is too neat to make his story believable.
6.) Where did Helena and her friends get these candles and when did they light them if you believe his intruder story? It was raining outside at the time, and the candle wick would have been wet, making the candle impossible to light
.
7.) If a flashlight was used, and intruders were there, how did they know the dark house so well, and knowing exactly that MacDonald would be on the couch, and the kids in their beds upon entering?
8.) On drugs or not, who is stupid enough to enter the home of a medically trained Green Barret, his pregnant wife, and three little girls thinking that they are going to win a fight against him?
9.) Why were none of these intruders not even injured in the slightest during the alleged struggle? Prosecutor Jim Blackburn said that "If MacDonald's story were true, one of those people (at least) would be dead from him fighting with them during the struggle." I say, maybe not dead, but at least very badly injured.
10.) How are all these people able to fight in such a small space in that living room? There was only about 4-6 feet between the couch and the coffee table where all of this took place.
11.) Look at the magazines, newspapers, neatly stacked underneath the overturned table. If there was a fight in the living room, the living room would look like the slaughter house that was found in the bedrooms, where the evidence shows all the fighting and horror took place.
Satch
Yes, and someone also threw away MacDonald's PJ bottoms. Collette did use candles though and there were some unidentified prints that could not be traced to anybody. All this says is that Collette wasn't the neatest housekeeper and that there was botched handling of evidence during the investigation. But DNA testing was done for Stockley, and Mitchell at the crime scene for follow up and there was no match. The unidentified prints could have come from guests who visited the MacDonald's home.
Satch
Collette had 2 kids, she was pregnant, and also attending a few college classes. I bet that house hadn't been "fussy" cleaned in months. It was probably "pick up clutter, vacuum, call it good".
Even if the entire house had been meticulously gone over for evidence, and finger printed, there probably would have been tons of stuff found in the house from other folks.
The testimony regarding the youngest child, it seemed that McDonald had emotional reaction the most to her death. The other two, were killed in an accidental fit of rage. The toddler, was killed in order to "make" the story. Kristen?
Even if we discount everything in the book, "Fatal Vision". The fact that a trained Green Beret couldn't even wound one of the attackers, either McDonald is the worst Green Beret ever, or he is a liar. Either way, the amount of drugs he was taking to be the "perfect doctor, Green Beret, Father", I believe that he hadn't had enough sleep, was tricked out on speed, and over reacted. After that, he needed a story.