Agreed. Which is one of the main reasons I doubt NH's story:
IMO, this means that he didn't drop her off where he expected to drop her off. And, IMO, he would have expected to drop her off at the same place where he picked her up. So, it seems to me that, according to his story, he picked her up at some location that was closer to her apartment than the location where he dropped her off.
But wait:
Why would he think this if he picked her up so close to where she lived? IMO, this seems like an inconsistency in his story.
In listening to his interviews, I find it suspicious that while he was going into such details about some things, (how he met her, who she was with, didn't know she was married, what happened when he dropped her off) that he completely brushed over where he picked her UP from. If her car was at the apartments, which I believe it was, then it only seems logical for him to have picked her up there. If he had picked her up at the same corner he dropped her off at, then why did he not say that? It made me feel that he was trying to make people believe that their relationship was so casual that he did not even know which apartment she lived in? I believe that was a lie! Big Red Flag for me!!