Time will tell, I hope. My wish is that MH has nothing to do with Kelli's disappearance.
To the ones who KNOW this to be true, good for you.
I think that a clear distinction must be made to clear up basic logical fallacies in this conversation.
There is a distinction between logical certitude and logical probability.
Those who think NH may be the perp are simply thinking in terms of logical probability, meaning that all the known facts about his case point in his direction, thus it is probable that he is the perp.
This is based on NH as sex offender, a violent and sexual predator toward a child.
Also, that he was the last to see her and in her company on the date of her disappearance.
Further, LE specifically states that NH has information as to KB's location.
All of the known facts, even though incomplete, do point in the direction of NH.
However, this does not mean there is logical certitude that NH is the perp 100% it simply means it is probable given the known facts of the case.
It is logically possible that NH is innocent and some other perp is responsible for her disappearance.
Although it is logically possible this could be the case, since there are absolutely no known facts to strongly support alternative theories at this time, then it is simply not probable based on the only facts we do have knowledge of in this case.
This could and can change as an investigation develops, though we will not have this information unless they choose to release it accordingly.