LCoastMom
JUSTICE FOR CAYLEE MARIE - STILL WAITING
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2008
- Messages
- 7,517
- Reaction score
- 43
My theory on this is...
AD needed to score some drugs...MAM is a pedophile...AD decides to let MAM do what he wanted to Shaniya so she could get drugs.
MAM comes to AD's home and they give Shaniya "water" in a cup, Shaniya gets "sleepy"...MAM takes Shaniya to the back to do what he came to do. AD was in the home and knew what was happening...during the abuse the brother wakes up to hear "stomping" and goes back to sleep...Shaniya loses control of her bowels (common in sexual abuse when a child is so young)...it's a mess...
Shaniya's body is really damaged (I hate that word) by this monster...they realize they are not gonna be able to pass this off...he must take her...AD lets him take her that morning knowing Shaniya was not coming back...the plan was MAM was to get rid of her...he instead decides to stop off at the hotel for a last go...(hence the pre-mature phone call to LE to make the false report...AD did not know about the stop at the hotel)...
MAM abuses Shaniya again at the hotel...takes her from the hotel in his car...kills her and dumps her.
Now, I think there was never a sewerage problem in the trailer as was first reported. They found it on the porch, on the railing, on the blanket in the neighbors trash...I think at first look, LE thought backed up sewer. I think in reality, there was just a lot of feces due to repeated abuse.
I think AD was in the living room getting high as a kite while MAM brutally abused her child. She knew it was going on.
I don't think MAM went to the hotel to "sell" Shaniya to someone else...I think he went there for himself.
I know this post was long, but it is my theory. JMO MOO and all that jazz.
AD and MAM are directly responsible for Shaniya's death and they should both be charged with murder IMO.
I absolutely respect your right to state it... here's my problem with your theory.
AD's sister and boyfriend were in the "house" during the night, IIRC. All those adults let that happen to her, under their nose? Why aren't they in jail?
I have trouble with the idea of another rapist too since there has been no talk of looking for another perp, that maybe something LE is still working on IDK. Although I have also read the lengths some rapists have used to prevent leaving behind any dna too...
The psychologist who reviewed the tape of Shaniya holding her feet (or knees) together said it may be a sign of molestation, but her hand resting on his shoulder was a position of trust, she felt Shaniya had no idea what she was facing. I can't imagine a baby who had been sexually abused all night would be sitting in his arms calmly, a lamb going to slaughter. She's 5 but she is no fool - she knows they are going to a room that has a bed - if she had been in a bed, abused all night - I don't think she would go again quietly.
Her bro heard banging maybe they dosed the kids, MAM may have left and returned to pick up his prize and no one answered his knocking, so he bangs.
Bro wakes up looking for Shaniya, AD called 911 - she was clear and coherent... Had already been out in the streets "looking" That's a lot of activity for someone who got wasted the night before.
If Shaniya had been abused so badly that her feces were all over that trailer, I don't see her sitting quietly, in his arms - I feel she would appear to be in pain or ill or at least terrified of the who was carrying her. Which is why I believe LE has not released the video of them leaving.
I have long gone with the the thought that child rape left the child (particularly a young child) in dire need of medical treatment. I was wrong and now understand why it is so difficult to get a conviction in the un-witnessed sexual abuse of young children and why it is vitally important for children to be believed when they cry rape.
One site (and as you will see I was looking through medical and forensic information) only one author documented severe injury would be expected. Of course a child would be bruised and likely scraped (friction burns) but for almost every sign of rape - there is another condition that could have caused it.
Following the physical findings I have also examined NC statutes that would verify some of the reasons that Shaniya should not have been in AD's care and again make me wonder why she was ever there. In the following link I punched in No Carolina in the search box:
http://www.childwelfare.gov/systemw...e/index.cfm?event=stateStatutes.processSearch
http://www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/usermanuals/sexabuse/sexabusec.cfm
It is also important to appreciate that for the majority of sexually abused children there are no physical findings. These findings, particularly vaginal ones, are most useful with prepubertal victims.
Despite the progress noted above, the highest probability indicators are ones identified over 10 years ago. They are: pregnancy in a child and venereal disease in a child. Semen in the vagina is the highest probability finding, but it is uncommon.
Bite marks, abrasions, redness, "hickeys," scratches, or bruises may be found.
If there has been forceful anal penetration, it may result in bruising and scrapes. A shortening or eversion of the anal canal has been found in very young children who have been chronically anally penetrated.54 Perianal fissures and scars from fissures are thought to be indicative of sexual abuse.
Erythema or redness and swelling might be caused by genital manipulation or intrusion perpetrated by a significantly older person. However, it might also be the result of poor hygiene, diaper rash, or perhaps the child's masturbation. Increased vascularity, synechiae, and labial adhesions may be a consequence of sexual abuse, but they are common findings in children with other genital complaints.
Vulvovaginitis and chronic urinary tract infections can be sequelae of sexual abuse but also can be caused by other circumstances, such as poor hygiene, a bubble bath, or, in the case of urinary tract infections, taking antibiotics.
http://www.enotalone.com/article/9939.html
However, this progress is not without its controversies. Knowledgeable and conscientious physicians may differ regarding conclusions about certain physical findings. This difference of opinion is primarily due to the fact that data collection regarding the physical signs of sexual abuse has preceded careful documentation of characteristics of genitalia and anal anatomy of children who have not been sexually abused and of variations among normal children. These legitimate differences of opinion have been augmented by challenges to the medical documentation from defense attorneys, their expert witnesses, and alleged offenders.
Genital injuries heal rapidly and can leave no scars. Penile, digital or object penetration of the anus does not always lead to injuries even if the child is seen very soon after the abuse. Sexual torture cannot be disproved by the absence of injuries or scars.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19920333
In a prospective study 205 prepubertal girls (mean age, 5.4 years) determined by Child Protective Services to be victims of sexual abuse were examined. Sixty-five girls (32%) had normal-appearing genitalia, 45 girls had nonspecific findings, and 95 girls had findings considered to be specific for sexual abuse. Whereas normal-appearing genitalia were most often observed in girls reporting digital assault, specific findings were more commonly observed in girls reporting genitogenital assault. Overall it was possible to document the presence of abnormal genital findings indicating or strongly suggesting sexual abuse in only 46% of the patients in this study group.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2916614
1. Many parents, social workers, investigators, prosecutors, defense attorneys, therapists, etc. assume that an abused child will show physical signs of the abuse.
2. In most reported cases of child sexual abuse, however, there is no physical or medical evidence that a child has been sexually abused.
3. For example, Paul (1977) reports that penile penetration in young children results in diffuse and widespread injuries including multiple tears and bruising in the labia, vaginal walls and hymen. The injury will bleed and the child will experience immediate and excruciating pain. If an accusation of penetration in a very young child is made and there is no physical evidence, it is unlikely that the accusation is true.
. Violent cases of sexual abuse can produce nongenital cuts and bruises (Woodling & Kossoris, 1981). Sometimes there is abrasion or bruising of the inner surface of the lips, looseness of the incisor teeth, or even damage to the frenulum of the upper lip in cases where a very young child has been sexually assaulted. Such injuries accompany the attempts to muffle the child's screams (Paul, 1977).
http://www.ipt-forensics.com/library/oklahoma9.htm
The Sexual Abuse of Children: Volume II: Clinical Issues By William T. O'Donohue, James H. Geer chapter 3 said exactly the same thing
(This book was found by Googling physical signs of sexual abuse of a young child.)
Circumstances That Are Grounds for Termination of Parental Rights
Gen. Stat. § 7B-1111
The parent has abused or neglected the child.
The parent is incapable of providing for the proper care of the child as a result of substance abuse, mental retardation, mental illness, or organic brain syndrome.
N.C. Stat. Ann. § 15A-1340.16 (LexisNexis through 2008 Reg. Sess.)
Parental Drug Use as Child Abuse is enough but add to it:
- aggravating or mitigating factors
The offense is the manufacture of methamphetamine and was committed where a person under age 18 lives, was present, or was otherwise endangered by exposure to the drug, its ingredients, its byproducts, or its waste.
As was the case in the house that was raided last summer...
Penalties for Failure to Report and False Reporting of Child Abuse and Neglect
Failure to Report - Gen. Stat. § 7B-310
No privilege shall be grounds for any person or institution failing to report that a juvenile may have been abused, neglected, or dependent, even if the knowledge or suspicion is acquired in an official professional capacity, except when the knowledge or suspicion is gained by an attorney from that attorney's client during representation only in the abuse, neglect, or dependency case...
This clearly says no one is exempt from reporting possible abuse, penalties include fines and jail-time.