Hraefn has posted all of them so no need to post them again.About to be back home and will do all of the tweets I missed
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hraefn has posted all of them so no need to post them again.About to be back home and will do all of the tweets I missed
Your wish is my command.I wish we could watch this testimony live
Wow, what a day! Thanks so much everyone for posting updates! What a sick relationship Crews and Hoehn had. IMO Crews was the mastermind but I think Hoehn knew more and participated more than he's admitting. I guess it doesn't really matter since I'm pretty sure he's going to spend the rest of his life in prison too. They're both liars - I don't believe Crews is remorseful either but that JMO.
That stood out to me as well. Was she going to say Savanna left her baby with me and she hasn't come back? So messed up.Here's what really stuck out to me about her testimony: She claims she asked Will, more than once, if she could take the baby downstairs (to the baby's grandparents) and Will said no.
What the heck did she plan on saying to them?
IMO it's another one of her lies. She also testified that she was confident that Hoehn wouldn't call the police on her so which was it, that he was so controlling (and she was sooo remorseful) that he prevented her from taking the baby to the grandparents or that he was so enthralled with her that he wouldn't squeal on her?That stood out to me as well. Was she going to say Savanna left her baby with me and she hasn't come back? So messed up.
IMO it's another one of her lies. She also testified that she was confident that Hoehn wouldn't call the police on her so which was it, that he was so controlling (and she was sooo remorseful) that he prevented her from taking the baby to the grandparents or that he was so enthralled with her that he wouldn't squeal on her?
Nope, uh uh, not buying it. Just like her saying Savanna wanted her to induce labor or that Savanna hit her head on the sink and was knocked out.
For all of Crews' yowling about what a bad person she is and how sorry she is she continues to look for ways to make others partly responsible for her horrendous act. IMO if she had gotten away with the murder and kidnapping she wouldn't have given another thought to what she did to Savanna.
Regarding 'taking any acts in furtherance of the plan': Would putting the rope around her neck to make sure she died, qualify?Here is the ND statute on conspiracy as an FYI. I'm not sure the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard can be met in this case after BC's testimony. While the conspiracy doesn't have to be explicit under ND law, the facts so far seem to indicate WH walked in on this and joined in rather than had any involvement in the planning and taking any acts in furtherance of the plan. JMO.
» North Dakota Code 12.1-06-04 – Criminal conspiracyLawServer
That's where I think there is grey area that probably comes down to state case law (and for the attorneys' to argue more effectively). I remember some cases from law school where a conspiracy was deemed to have occurred in a split second, but there were some others where the opposite result came down. A jury could probably find either way, honestly. It's a tough case for the jurors IMO.Regarding 'taking any acts in furtherance of the plan': Would putting the rope around her neck to make sure she died, qualify?
And stupid monsters at that!! They had no plan after committing their heinous crime. No plan to leave town or even leave the apt building. The police and the Greywinds were breathing down their necks and they continued to come and go from their apt with 'their' Native American baby.I agree.
I don't believe anything that comes out of her mouth, or his. They are both monsters!