Found Deceased NE - Sydney Loofe, 24, Lincoln, 15 Nov 2017 #2

[gitana1]

Glad to have you on the case, Gitana.

Yes, there is definitely a sinister vibe to this case. Many suspected trafficking from the start, and I inched toward that suspicion too. The male-female duo were up to no good from the start, before that first Tinder date. Sydney was trapped....but for what purpose we don't know yet.

I do have high hopes the case will be solved.

jmopinion

This is the very first case that initially involved a missing person in which I agree trafficking is a plausible scenario! It is brought up all be time and never seems likely to me. But I can see these two deadbeats deciding to lure women into something they can make money from.

Gosh those videos are odd. All covered up. Weirdo showing only one eye and the other one hiding behind glasses and a hoodie. The YouTube comments were hilarious. "No. You're not creepy as F!" Stuff like that.

 

[Inthedetails]

I never understood the casino pictures of AT and BB. Where they old pictures or pictures from a few days after Sydney went missing where BB was to meet her?

It is unclear, but I'm going with the idea that they were recent, after LE learned about the Wilbur ping and knew the identities of the date and of AT. I think LE somehow knew they were at the casino and pulled video of them. I admit that is an assumption and not fact.

I wish we did know the date! It would really help.

jmo
jmo

 

[JerseyGirl]

Gosh those videos are odd. All covered up. Weirdo showing only one eye and the other one hiding behind glasses and a hoodie.

BB had to cover the fact that she poured bleach in her hair and on her eyebrows.

 

[mrsu]

Does anybody have an old link handy that listed the 3 women missing from Nebraska around the time of Sydney’s disappearance? I can’t seem to find it.

I rewatched the Aubrey video and he states the same thing in both videos. That they had a girl (names “Katie” in the second video) with them for a week and the Omaha Police Dept kept calling Katie telling her she was in danger so they dropped her off the day before Thanksgiving, the 22nd. Says she was there to witness them trying to make contact with the police and was with them for about a week.

An actual week would be Nov 15-22nd.

 

[Inthedetails]

This is the very first case that initially involved a missing person in which I agree trafficking is a plausible scenario! It is brought up all be time and never seems likely to me. But I can see these two deadbeats deciding to lure women into something they can make money from.

Gosh those videos are odd. All covered up. Weirdo showing only one eye and the other one hiding behind glasses and a hoodie. The YouTube comments were hilarious. "No. You're not creepy as F!" Stuff like that.

Yes, and the fact that two were on video at a casino just lends support to a trafficking aspect, imo. And AT lives in Wilbur but nobody ever sees him also seems creepy and dark.
The case just feels.....sinister, as you said.

I hope the female POI catches on that she was used and then spills the beans. Anything out of AT's mouth is likely garbage.

jmopinion

 

[gitana1]

My guess is heroin.

But she calls him "babe" which is odd for a lesbian to be calling a male friend.

 

[Monaural Binkie]

I’m just curious if anyone thinks Bailey was involved and not Aubrey? In the second video of Aubrey he is adamant and says that he may be a thief but he’s never hurt or let alone murdered anyone. Do you think there’s any truth to that or is he a cold blooded psychopath?

I really don't think she is involved and he's not, however that part of the video is interesting to me. He actually says, not that he has never hurt anyone but he has never hurt a female. I just think that that clarification is a strange one if you're outright lying.
I would automatically say "I've never hurt anyone" but then, I haven't.
Maybe he was scared whatever males he has beaten up or god knows what in his past would come forward and contradict him so he was very specific so as to avoid that, but it does make me think he really hasn't hurt a female before, whether or not he did hurt Sydney. I think if he had he would either leave this statement out completely, or just go ahead and say "I've never hurt anyone."
This is only really worth mentioning because of all the theories doing the rounds that there must be other women who have been hurt by the couple and got away etc.

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk

 

[Hatfield]

I think they both were involved with the disposal of the body. Beyond that, I don't know.

jmopinion

JMO
Just reading about this case for the first time. Another sad case.

I agree both are likely to be involved. I suspect luring her with the goal of robbing her is a possible motive. It would not surprise me if the female was the one that ended up causing her actual death.

All I know right now is the poor victim ended up dead after apparently going to meet one of them. I am glad that LE has these two under the microscope right now. I hope LE is able to get the evidence they need to make a case.

 

[JerseyGirl]

But she calls him "babe" which is odd for a lesbian to be calling a male friend.

Doesn't she have a child somewhere? Maybe bi, not lesbian.

Is there Tinder for women wanting to meet women? I am not familiar with the app at all. My sister has it and showed me months ago, but her results were all male.

 

[Monaural Binkie]

But she calls him "babe" which is odd for a lesbian to be calling a male friend.

If you've decided she's a lesbian based only on the date with Sydney I'd be inclined to rethink.

She used a fake profile with fake details and a fake name. Seems highly possible she faked everything.
We know she has a real daughter by a real man who she was really engaged to and really dated, all using her real name and her real facebook profile with links to her real family.
The only hint of her being either gay or bi that I have come upon from the start is the meet up with Sydney and the mention of a "sometimes girlfriend, Katie" who's existence has yet to be verified. I suspect it never will be and she was only brought up to divert suspicion in the video and to stop anyone wandering what straight old BB was doing swiping right to Sydney in the first place.


Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk

 

[molly1255]

It is unclear, but I'm going with the idea that they were recent, after LE learned about the Wilbur ping and knew the identities of the date and of AT. I think LE somehow knew they were at the casino and pulled video of them. I admit that is an assumption and not fact.

I wish we did know the date! It would really help.

jmo
jmo

BB said (in one of the videos) that after the second date, she dropped SL off at a friend's house, she gave her her phone number and told her they were going to the casino over the weekend but that she never heard from SL again.

I think LE secured the video footage of BB and AT at a casino, perhaps based on statements made by BB. The video does shows that SL was not with them. My guess is the video at the casino was sometime during the weekend after November 15, when SL went missing.

 

[AzPistonsGirl]

Doesn't she have a child somewhere? Maybe bi, not lesbian.

OT - Lesbians can and do have children. <wink>

 

[TTF14]

Sorry to ask what is probably a dumb question already discussed, but what has become of the information that she supposedly dropped Sydney off at a friend's house?

 

[Monaural Binkie]

Sorry to ask what is probably a dumb question already discussed, but what has become of the information that she supposedly dropped Sydney off at a friend's house?

Nothing came of it.

LE say they were unable to verify any of BBS claims in the videos.



Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk

 

[JerseyGirl]

OT - Lesbians can and do have children. <wink>

Well, yes, I know that, but found it odd to label her a lesbian.

 

[Hatfield]

JMO
Assuming robbery was the motive. One mystery to me is it seems that one of them would have to first confirm that SL had either some money or credit cards or something worth robbing.

Because surely they would not just kill her and then go pillaging through her purse after the killing would they? Because she may have not had anything much to rob.

So wondering how they managed to find out SL had something worth robbing. Maybe details can be found in the communication they had beforehand. Like if the planned date involved having enough money to do something like going to a casino to gamble or something along those lines. Then they would have reason to believe that SL would be bringing some money along.

All this is assuming robbery was even the motive and the motive is not known yet so I suppose we will have to wait till more details are provided to us before we can determine what the motive really was.

Robbery is the motive I keep going to for this case but I agree with others that it could have been something else too like trafficking.
IMO, trafficking just seems too complex of a scheme for the two POI. I may be wrong of course and it could be that or something nobody has thought of yet.

 

[Monaural Binkie]

JMO
Assuming robbery was the motive. One mystery to me is it seems that one of them would have to first confirm that SL had either some money or credit cards or something worth robbing.

Because surely they would not just kill her and then go pillaging through her purse after the killing would they? Because she may have not had anything much to rob.

So wondering how they managed to find out SL had something worth robbing. Maybe details can be found in the communication they had beforehand. Like if the planned date involved having enough money to do something like going to a casino to gamble or something along those lines. Then they would have reason to believe that SL would be bringing some money along.

All this is assuming robbery was even the motive and the motive is not known yet so I suppose we will have to wait till more details are provided to us before we can determine what the motive really was.

Robbery is the motive I keep going to for this case but I agree with others that it could have been something else too like trafficking.
IMO, trafficking just seems too complex of a scheme for the two POI. I may be wrong of course and it could be that or something nobody has though of yet.

Are you suggesting they planned to rob and kill her or just rob her and something went wrong?

They didn't use her bank or credit cards and she didn't have her car or anything with her.

It seems a bit of a risk to assume she would bring enough cash to be worth killing for? And why the two dates?

I can't fathom a motive in this case, so bizarre.

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk

 

[whitelilac]

Iirc Sydney did not drive her own car to meet BB on the first date. I thought at the time that could be a little risky as normally one would meet in a public place for the first time. But Sydney was meeting a woman.
I wonder whether this was part of the duo's MO, to lure young women who felt "safer" with another woman.
I'm not sure Bailey is even gay, but she only presented herself that way.

 

[GrilledCheezy]

Iirc Sydney did not drive her own car to meet BB on the first date. I thought at the time that could be a little risky as normally one would meet in a public place for the first time. But Sydney was meeting a woman.
I wonder whether this was part of the duo's MO, to lure young women who felt "safer" with another woman.
I'm not sure Bailey is even gay, but she only presented herself that way.

This. I think Bailey was "situationally" gay.

 

[Hatfield]

Are you suggesting they planned to rob and kill her or just rob her and something went wrong?

They didn't use her bank or credit cards and she didn't have her car or anything with her.

It seems a bit of a risk to assume she would bring enough cash to be worth killing for? And why the two dates?

I can't fathom a motive in this case, so bizarre.

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk

JMO
At least right now, I guess I am thinking they may have just tried to rob her and something went wrong where they felt they had to kill her. Like maybe they hoped that SL would never be able to identify them and maybe they realized SL would know how to find out where they lived or who they really were so maybe they felt they had to kill her to keep from getting caught.

Or maybe SL began to put up a good fight as she was being robbed.

The reasons I tend to think robbery is because the POI ended up at a casino if I read things right. I could see them going there if they ended up getting some funds from their victim.

The other reason I think they were trying to keep their true identify from SL was because of the strange videos they released. It showed that they were thinking to stay disguised. So I am betting they wanted to stay disguised from SL too.

I think SL probably only met with the female and I bet the male POI was not part of the initial meeting. I am kind of thinking right now that the female hoped to have robbed her and just run off and maybe the male person was close by if anything went wrong.

Just speculation as to the motive. I dont get a sense they had a very elaborate scheme whatever it was. Although I would not doubt if there are other victims of these two. They may have done this sort of thing before and maybe were getting better at it until they ran into SL.