I have searched and searched this morning to find the interview last night where Mark Klaas was being interviewed about Lisa and her being missing for 6 months. Gil Abeyta was one of the people who did a call-in interview and whoever the moderator was, just let him go on and on. I don't remember what show it was on, I was thinking perhaps JVM, but I'm sure someone here saw it and knows what I'm talking about. I have to admit that I was absolutely shocked that Abeyta is still running on the assumption that James Brando is the abductor. He outlined how Brando had military training to teach him how to do these type of missions, etc. I was just flabbergasted to hear this theory again!
I know that Gil has had his own experience, but this experience sure seems to have jaded him in this case. And, I was even more surprised that whoever the moderator was, they just let him keep going about this bizarre theory. I felt bad for him, actually.
If anyone knows how to find this video, I would love to see it again and be very appreciative because I think I was in so much shock that I didn't catch it all!
in this article he outlines 5 possible reasons someone would kidnap a baby
1) love
2) ransom
3) sale
4) accident
5) revenge
he says statistics rule out 1, 2, 3 which leaves only 4 and 5
if he thinks JB took her that rules out 4 so that leaves 5 which coincidentally is the same reason he believes his baby was taken
how or why JB would be involved in a revenge scenario in his mind or what he thinks JB did with her, IDK.
http://www.examiner.com/missing-per...lisa-still-missing-why-would-someone-take-her
He forgets 6) covering up child's not-so-accidental death.
The reason I have a hard time thinking that this was any kind of well-planned precise military operation is that I would not expect such an abductor to let himself be seen with the baby without any kind of disguise. Some neighbors apparently saw him without as much as a baseball cap or a hoodie to cover his features and the baby was well visible as well.
I saw that. IIRC, it was the show on HLN that airs just before JVM. Vinny Politan's show. Sorry can't think of the name of it and I believe Mike Brooks was sitting in for Vinny. HTH
Has GA elaborated on what he thinks the neighbor did with Lisa after abducting her?
in this article he outlines 5 possible reasons someone would kidnap a baby
1) love
2) ransom
3) sale
4) accident
5) revenge
he says statistics rule out 1, 2, 3 which leaves only 4 and 5
if he thinks JB took her that rules out 4 so that leaves 5 which coincidentally is the same reason he believes his baby was taken
how or why JB would be involved in a revenge scenario in his mind or what he thinks JB did with her, IDK.
http://www.examiner.com/missing-per...lisa-still-missing-why-would-someone-take-her
... I was absolutely shocked that Abeyta is still running on the assumption that James Brando is the abductor...
Thanks for your post. So if there's evidence of an intruder taking Lisa, statistics show that it's more likely a women than a man who did it.unlike an just sentenced example (linked below) which actually is in line with FBI statistics and profiles (along with the other example earlier this spring where a woman killed the mother/stole the baby as the mom left a dr's office) of who kidnaps very young children:
FBI: "About once a month, a woman somewhere in the U.S. steals a baby. She takes the child because she can't conceive, because she has lost a child or because she has just suffered a miscarriage or stillbirth."
"Documented cases of baby-nappers show they are nearly always women, and although they range in age from 16 to 72, they are primarily in their mid-20s or early 40s."
stephanie foster, woman, 36:
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_...rs-in-ind-prison/?tag=contentMain;contentBody
unlike an just sentenced example (linked below) which actually is in line with FBI statistics and profiles (along with the other example earlier this spring where a woman killed the mother/stole the baby as the mom left a dr's office) of who kidnaps very young children:
FBI: "About once a month, a woman somewhere in the U.S. steals a baby. She takes the child because she can't conceive, because she has lost a child or because she has just suffered a miscarriage or stillbirth."
"Documented cases of baby-nappers show they are nearly always women, and although they range in age from 16 to 72, they are primarily in their mid-20s or early 40s."
stephanie foster, woman, 36:
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_...rs-in-ind-prison/?tag=contentMain;contentBody
So our best SODDI is that SB who miscarried while DB was pregnant with Lisa managed to take Lisa and has her stashed somewhere? Honestly it's my favorite theory since that means Lisa is alive, I'd just like some evidence. How would Lisa be kept concealed all the time? Does SB still live next door to DB/JI?
I mean honestly SB could have had it arranged ahead of time, and said "I'm gonna pee and check on the kids" and handed Lisa out the back door.
I wasn't talking about SB, I meant some as yet unknown woman who was watching the house.
The problem I have with a stranger abduction is the lack of evidence. While we do not know everything the police know, if there had been evidence of a stranger abduction surely the police would be asking for the public's help in locating Lisa. If SB took or had Lisa taken, then her DNA would already be in the house and it wouldn't raise a red flag.
Not that I'm sold on that theory since we have a cadaver hit, no Lisa sightings, and from what we know SB and DB are still friends. I'd think that'd be a hard thing to keep from a friend.