New website for Lisa

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
redheadedgal said:
1) To occupy her time, Picerno said, Bradley has created a website aimed at finding Lisa or gathering clues to her disappearance.


2) the site never looked very professional. several of us said it from the beginning. it's totally amateurish so no way was it initially created by a professional website developer imo.
Click to expand...

Sorry should of made my thoughts clearer.

Yes I did understand that she was probably designing the site as per her attorney.

My thoughts were with respect to if they were hosting the website which they could of decided to no longer host it.

Hope that is a bit clearer.
 
OT Amber Alert just issued in in Kansas City surburb for 14-year-old girl. First Amber Alert in KC area since Lisa's
 
what the -- ??!!

this pic is now on the website and captioned as "lisa beauty mark"...

it is clearly a pic of an adult arm, not the leg of a baby. the adjacent pic clearly shows adult arm hair lol

now, i'd imagine deb might have meant to indicate lisa's beauty mark "resembled" the ones pictured... but to label pictures as such is really misleading, inappropriate and A LIE !!!
 

Attachments

  • lisabeautymark2.jpg
    lisabeautymark2.jpg
    167.2 KB · Views: 24
redheadedgal said:
what the -- ??!!

this pic is now on the website and captioned as "lisa beauty mark"...

it is clearly a pic of an adult arm, not the leg of a baby. the adjacent pic clearly shows adult arm hair lol

now, i'd imagine deb might have meant to indicate lisa's beauty mark "resembled" the ones pictured... but to label pictures as such is really misleading, inappropriate and A LIE !!!
Click to expand...

Hey...it's DB we are talking about here...lol
 
this is getting ridiculous... now they changed the missing poster to say pants instead of shorts?


poster.jpg
 
I guess I can remotely understand why they might feel talking to LE any more is not productive. And if DB wants to put up a website, more power to her.

But what possible reasoning could a not-guilty person have for not taking advantage of media? There are many objective reporters, Jim Spellman, local KC reporters, who just want to hear the story again, who want to help them correct the apparent misconceptions that DB talks/cries about. We've all had times we didn't put our best foot forward and wanted a "do over". EVERYONE wants this baby home. EVERYONE wants to help. EVERYONE wants the criminal punished. Why can't the parents see that?
 
askfornina said:
Maybe send an email to NCMEC if you are so inclined, because they are the ones that created that poster. Here it is on their site.
Click to expand...


thanks for pointing this out, nina.

obviously the parents are okay with information "changing" on the poster about their missing daughter if they posted it on the website. gotta wonder why they haven't shown NCMEC the error to get a corrected poster made... did they not even notice the mistake? too busy surfing the web to see what people are saying about you, deb?!
 
redheadedgal said:
what the -- ??!!

this pic is now on the website and captioned as "lisa beauty mark"...

it is clearly a pic of an adult arm, not the leg of a baby. the adjacent pic clearly shows adult arm hair lol

now, i'd imagine deb might have meant to indicate lisa's beauty mark "resembled" the ones pictured... but to label pictures as such is really misleading, inappropriate and A LIE !!!
Click to expand...

You can't make this &&(( up.
 
redheadedgal said:
what the -- ??!!

this pic is now on the website and captioned as "lisa beauty mark"...

it is clearly a pic of an adult arm, not the leg of a baby. the adjacent pic clearly shows adult arm hair lol

now, i'd imagine deb might have meant to indicate lisa's beauty mark "resembled" the ones pictured... but to label pictures as such is really misleading, inappropriate and A LIE !!!
Click to expand...

They must of changed the wording on the picture because it says "This is what Lisa's birthmark looks like on her outer thigh."
 
highflyer said:
They must of changed the wording on the picture because it says "This is what Lisa's birthmark looks like on her outer thigh."
Click to expand...


LMAO -- that didn't take long!!

( it actually says "beauty mark" not birth mark ;) )


don't know what's funnier-- the fact it had to be pointed out to them :notgood: or how quickly they attempted to remedy it...


btw, imo, "this is what the beauty mark on lisa's outer thigh looks like" sounds more grammatically correct :twocents:
 
redheadedgal said:
LMAO -- that didn't take long!!

( it actually says "beauty mark" not birth mark ;) )


don't know what's funnier-- the fact it had to be pointed out to them :notgood: or how quickly they attempted to remedy it...


btw, imo, "this is what the beauty mark on lisa's outer thigh looks like" sounds more grammatically correct :twocents:
Click to expand...

Yes, it does say "beauty mark" not birth mark. Thanks.
 
Good to have a representation of the beauty mark. I've wondered what it looks like.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Staff online

Members online

... and 73 more.
Total: 288 (members: 74, guests: 214)

Online statistics

Members online
74
Guests online
214
Total visitors
288
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
608,353
Messages
18,238,124
Members
234,350
Latest member
pto002studyguide
Back
Top