Rather, half knots are referred to in the link you provided, and they tied in a different manor than half hitches as the animations on the pages I just linked demonstrate. Would you please acknowledge these simple facts?
Both can actually be tied either two loose ends or one, though each are arguably more suitable for the situations depicted on the pages I lined for them respectively. However, in this case both the square knots, created from two half knots rather than half hitches, were on one shoelace that connecting the left wrist and left ankle of Michel Moore. Hence, at least one of those square knots was made starting with a half knot using only one loose end.
Yes, but both are used to start markedly different knots. For example one starts the common shoelace knot with a half knot, not a half hitch.
Lisa Sakevicius testified to there being square knots, knots which were two to four half hitches, and and knots she described as "a half hitch with a figure eight". In regard to the latter she further elaborated that the half hitch was "tied after the figure eight", which best I can tell is a description of a butcher's knot (here's a page which uses that same terminology as Sakevicius to describe it). Again that is a simple knot, but tied in notably different manor that either a square knot or any series of half hitches.
The prosecution didn't imply the knots were "totally different", but rather noted that Sakevicius to testified fact that: there were three notably different types of knots used to tie up the boys. Please come to terms with that simple fact.
Where exactly, in your opinion, did the prosecution do what you claim? Please quote trial transcripts so every can see exactly what you are referring to for themselves
Everything is flawed. Perfection only exists in the realm of imagination.
