Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, MC's DNA is in the databases and she is Terry's child so yes, his family DNA is represented there.I wouldn't be at all surprised if TPR had more children out there. I wonder if they've put his family DNA on GEDmatch to see what shakes out.
It's interesting that both Denise and Marlyse were last seen by their families at Thanksgiving. I wonder if there is any significance to that. Perhaps it's a "trigger" for TR from something in his past? Or maybe it's just a coincidence.
I think it is mainly the consequence of families getting together on holidays. Whenever someone disappears, the family remembers the last time they have seen them, which is often holidays
The girl's Doenetwork entry (802UFNH) now says this (bolded by me):
Isotope tests on this child's remains indicated she was not originally from New Hampshire and likely only spent a few weeks or months in the New Hampshire region before her death. In viewing the timeline for Rasmussen, it appears most likely that this decedent was born in Texas, possibly on the Gult Coast if Rasmussen was working on an oil rig at the time.
From Denise Beaudin's page in Charley Project Denise Beaudin – The Charley Project
...Isotope tests indicate she was probably born in a sparsely populated area of the interior western United States or one of the Plains States,
So it sounds like there's some disagreement on that front...
I mean anything is possible, it could be debts, payments, etc.I think her being born in Texas make sense tho? Remember in his timeline that at some point in 1978 he called a friend to borrow money, why else would you need more money if it weren't for a new born?
You bring up a good point. In the article posted by Claire stated this, RBBM for clarity:
This jumped out at me. Because, as far as we know, this pregnant girlfriend was not Marlyse. There is no mention of her being pregnant at the time she was found in the barrel (unless I totally missed that), and no knowledge of her having another baby right before her death (after Sarah).
If this pregnant girlfriend turns out to be Denise, that would narrow the timeline between Denise and Marlyse significantly, as we know D/L was about 6 months old when they left. My best guess conception was sometime in summer 1980. And if it was a pregnant Denise TPR introduced to Mr. Gallagher, there's a possibility TPR believed the baby was his.
If it wasn't Denise or Marlyse, we got another mystery on our hands.
The part about Eunsoon in the Chameleon video, after all the calls from her friend trying to0 reach, TPR had a lot of time and opportunity to run again. I wonder why he didn't.
I think it is mainly the consequence of families getting together on holidays. Whenever someone disappears, the family remembers the last time they have seen them, which is often holidays
I wonder if this means Denise and Marlyse/the girls died between Thanksgiving and Christmas?
There's no reason to think Denise died at the same time as the others. I think if she did, she'd have been in a barrel too.
The doe network says identified? Anyone know why?
Sorry, I think I worded it wrongly, I meant they both died between that time period but in different years. Just like between Thanksgiving-Christmas time period.
the doe network has a page for all four of the victims, and it says identified, under the title. i’m assuming this is because the other three have been identified.The only remaining unidentified victim from this thread is the middle child and I don’t see anything about her being identified on doe network. Can you provide more details on your question?
802UFNH