black_squirrel
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2013
- Messages
- 1,181
- Reaction score
- 988
following this case closely as I grew up near there. very sad.
on the khaki-colored pants I think people are reading too much into it. most hiking pants are khaki-colored and these are very popular in NH both when hiking and just as winter clothes. It looks like it was in the 50s in NH that day so it strikes me as not very informative - I imagine if you went to a grocery store that day about 25% of the men would be wearing khaki-colored pants - even among young men.
I think the theory they were targeted for being interracial is very real. I think the chance the person was wearing khakis because they were part of a group is slim - since if it was targeted to scare people you'd think the person would somehow want to make that known to actually scare people. like the buffalo shooter.
my (mostly baseless) theory is that is was just a person who decided they wanted to kill someone and get away with it. and the selection of the targets was semi-random based on their age, skin color, and maybe emptiness of the trail at the time.
The khaki pants may be a rabbit hole, but it is not just the khaki pants. The POI was also wearing a dark blue jacket or hoodie. This is the combination worn by hate groups such as "NSC-131" and "Patriot Front". It seems that NSC-131 wear jackets that are closer to black, and Patriot Front wears jackets closer to dark blue.
If this was a hate crime, scaring people may not have been the primary goal. The killer may have known the Reids,
or projected all his hatred onto them. He may not have looked for recognition in the form of notoriety to the general public, but rather get recognition within the white supremacy community.
Maybe. But remember they were shot multiple times. Whatever the motivation, this leads me to believe it was a strong one.
And how could anyone committing this kind of crime on these trails know they would not be seen or heard? Especially as this was done during daylight hours presumably. I'm not saying they were targeted but random slaying doesn't seem to fit either.
The bodies were moved, also. I think that is important. What if someone else had come into the area during commission of the crime? Would we have another person dead, too?
I hope the sketch of the suspect generates leads. This is a terrible crime against some very good people dedicated to making others' lives better.
MOO
I also wondered why the body were moved. Many shots were fired and I do believe that people on the trails or living nearby would have heard the shots. I believe that police said something along the lines that people overheard things,
but wasn't specific whether they had heard shots or other sounds. You would think that the killer would leave the scene as soon as possible. Moving two adult bodies will take some time (not sure how far they were moved). It was in the middle of the day during a holiday. It all seems very risky.
But perhaps, if this were a "thrill kill", the danger and risk to be caught might be part of the thrill....