*BBM*
Nope, you are dead on lady! (IMO
![Wink ;) ;)]()
)
Quite possibly the year's second most anticipated cross examination.
Would like to ask more about what the mega-sleuths are thinking here-
On direct, we have the most innocent, uninvolved, virtuous, little house on the prairie type victim... of a hard hitting, raunchy, sadistic, pornographic level of control. Her testimony begins, and there is cause to be concerned for her well-being, even under the protected, controlled setting of the courtroom. A poor, helpless, damaged victim.
On cross, we have a hyper-intelligent, un-emotional, cool as ice - not even a flinch - accepting the defense attorney's challenges and without even hesitation - she takes each one and with her response, beats him over the head with it repeatedly, efficiently and dynamically forcing his stumble. As testimony advances - her IQ rises, and we begin to detect a complex, brilliant aptitude emanate from her.
Curiosity is killing me _ I need to know what you think!! (checking now, but with this new testimony,,,)
Plus, she has been exposed to archons, and Tarot, her range of intellect wide, and far reaching.
And my favorite do far,
"Everything you told her - it was all lies," counsel asks
"I told her facts that were untrue."
I know, I know, how can one even begin to look in her direction - look at what is sitting at the defense table!! Case closed!! That is what I thought... until I I began to realize I was observing an individual who appears to practice multi-dimensional personality choice...
She is impressively advanced- and while I still give the defendant the chair if available for his actions, I am less certain ABOUT ACCEPTING THE IMNUNITY DEAL WITH Kat.
pLEASE SHARE your thoughts... on edge... thanks
The G