I like the latest account which I've been linking to:
http://issuu.com/soco/docs/april11?m...&pageNumber=76
I was surprised to see the new PI working the case is mentioning the rag stuffed into the tail pipe .... I never would have believed she would have let someone go into the trunk on their own, since that's she kept her BF's expensive jewelry.
Perhaps more important was that she did stop for gas not far from where her car ended up - what took place at that station??? Someone may have seen her, detected she was drinking/vulnerable and followed her...
Does that tie in with any local snow plow operators?
IIRC the school bus driver told to her to turn on her emergency flashers.
Why take time at the crash site and fiddle around with the rag when there's alcohol in your car, and you've been drinking... you know LE will soon be there...
No time to take the jewelry, but time to get the the rag and stuff the tailpipe?
I heard that she MAY have wanted to stop the smokey exhaust coming from the tailpipe, perhaps to draw less attention. I also have entertained the idea she didn't like breathing in the exhaust, while she was rummaging around in the trunk, so she stuck the rag in the tailpipe (remember, she was a competitive runner). I also thought that she used the rag as a flag, because her car was sticking out into the road. I doubt someone else put the rag in there. How did they get it out of her trunk? How did they know it was in the trunk in the first place? Why would she allow a stranger access to her trunk when she had expensive jewelry (with sentimental value) back there? IMO, I doubt it is connected to her disappearance. I think it just muddies the waters. One question I have always wondered about---did she have a flashlight in her emergency kit and did she take it along with her when she left the car? Not
that this really matters, because I think she either accepted a ride with a creep (unknowingly), got hit by a car, or succumbed to the elements. IMO, whatever happened to her happened after the accident.