gitana1
Verified Attorney
- Joined
- May 31, 2005
- Messages
- 29,421
- Reaction score
- 230,531
Thanks. I think giving people evil genius attributes makes them scarier and more powerful than they are. It also makes it harder to identify behavior that crosses lines or boundaries but isn't overtly threatening. If Carolyn ran into Kenneth Saal at random places, like starbucks or her local grocery store, she might not have noticed him but even if she did, she probably didn't jump to stalking. If that was happening. If someone's behavior makes you uncomfortable or gives you a bad vibe I feel like you should listen to that instinct. Her changing her routine could have made him feel like he was stood up for a date she didn't know existed. If he showed up at her door she might have been annoyed and he might not have taken that well.
Holy smokes! That's true. We mysticize these murderers until they become something so menacing in our minds it becomes impossible to recognize them. I hadn't thought about that consequence too much.
I mean I know that I have certain biases about this coward due to what I think he did. Such as that she could never be attracted to him and that he is repulsive. (I still think both, BTW). But people who knew him day to day may not have realized what they were looking at. He may have seemed pleasant, even affable to many people.
A couple of things I see a lot that I'm not sure are so accurate are that every murderer has to be a psychopath and that psychopaths can't feel and never feel guilt. Someone just mentioned the latter earlier.
However I don't think all murderers are psychopaths. They could be a variety of things. (Also an interesting side note is somehing that one of our resident psychs said on the Chris Watts thread about how we can't always pigeon hole a perp into a specific diagnostic category because most people don't precisely fit. Those are typically diagnosed for billing purposes is I think how he or she explained it. And as a result it all seems much cleaner to us lay people than it actually is).
And if they can be a variety of things we can't expect them all to react the same way or be triggered by the same things. So I guess the example is some perps might be compelled to confess if LE appeals to their parenthood. Or their religious roots. Or discusses the victim's family or whatever. In the Delphi case it appears, for instance, that LE has profiled the perp and they make public religious statements that could be meant to affect the possible perp. Because they have a theory that the perp might be religious and swayed by that.
And while I can't say I know enough about psychopaths, you can see some weird things that point to vestiges of guilt or shake or whatever that we think they're not supposed to have.
And example I give is how a serial killer might confess to multiple murders but one - the only one in which he covered the victims' face- that one he won't confess to and he gets evasive or irate of you mention it. Why? Something about that kid that made the monster feel human for a moment?
Another example is they kill lots of people but then finally, they don't kill one. They can't do it.
It's a complexity of character that makes them true wolves in sheep's clothing.
BTK killer was described as a super good father by his daughter. They were close. And look who he turned out to be!