I agree... I honestly think they’re piecing this together behind closed doors and most likely will not divulge until charges are brought... im thinking they don’t particularly need or want the public’s input on this one unless there’s a very specific tip..
If I recall correctly, the baby doesn't have his last name either.
Yep. MOO
So... not his biological dad either, uh? I think he only took the baby that one time because the baby was easier to take.
Not necessarily true. We have to keep in mind the way names of Mexican/Spanish origin are constructed. Many times it will be two last names with the father's last name first and mother's last name second. So, it is quite possible that Malcolm really has a last name of Torres Archuleta - we just don't know.
They do that with names in Mexico too? I know that in Spain, dad's name comes first and mom's is the last name but they go by the dad's name anyways.
It depends. Some Mexican people do it and others do not. I have even met some families who put the mother’s last name before the father’s but they also go by the dad’s name also if using just one.
IMO, there was way too much going on between the mother and the boyfriend for the coincidence of Renezmae wandering off on her own.
Or, she deliberately did not put his name on the birth certificate so that Child services would not go after him for child support.
I think people are just trying to understand the family dynamics here. Is Torres the bio father of either of the children? I think that is a valid question. JMO
Many years ago in another state a father had to come and sign the birth certificate. (Or go through court for paternity) He couldn’t just be named by the mother. Something like that is also possible depending on current procedures in that particular area
