As someone who has followed this case for some time, I am very appreciative of any feedback surrounding it. And I consider myself a constitutionalist regarding rights and proper procedures too. However, if, just if, a potential homicide had occurred on your property, or my property, to which we certainly were not the offender, and considering ourselves to be on the side of justice, do we not have a civic duty to help investigators, who only seek to assist law enforcement anyway? As you may be aware, cold cases have been solved with the help of private investigators.
You mention your appreciation of efforts to shed more light on this case, but that it may hinder an “ongoing investigation.” In a cold case such as this, an ongoing investigation isn't taking place, or the jurisdictions involved would not have released police reports via FOIA requests. Experience tells me thus far, HPD is not pursuing this case. I could be wrong though. And any integrity in it has waned, unless of course you know something I don't. In addition, it is apparent, isn't it, the perpetrator most certainly has already evaded capture and subsequent prosecution so far? In other words, the perpetrator has gotten away with murder. Unless you believe Steven is not dead.
Regarding Mr. Knapp, the only involvement Mr. Knapp had in this case, was his willingness to help get this story on the air, again. His credentials speak for him by themself. Once more, you speak of an “ongoing investigation” as if there is one. You fear speculation, and unverified claims, may distract from, or compromise it. Can you verify for all of us here there is an “ongoing investigation?” Your concern for integrity in the case is valid, but untimely. One only has to recall how this investigation was handled from the beginning, almost 14 years ago. A rather disharmonic investigation if you ask me. I have first-hand knowledge that the actual investigation was delayed for two weeks. Recall, it was very near the Christmas holiday. To conclude, I stand ready and willing to entertain an audience of law enforcement personnel to discuss this case. My question is, are they?
I appreciate your thoughtful response and your dedication to finding justice in this case. I agree with you that, in an ideal world, everyone would cooperate fully to help law enforcement in any investigation, particularly in a case as serious as a potential homicide. However, in reality, the legal processes and rights are there to protect everyone involved, and they need to be respected.
As for the ongoing investigation, I apologize if there was any confusion. I don't have any direct knowledge about the current status of the case. My concerns were more general, and based on the principles of respecting due process and potential legal complications that could arise from certain actions.
Regarding Mr. Knapp, my aim wasn't to discredit his reputation or his involvement in this case. Rather, I was pointing out that his public persona could potentially influence the perception of the case due to his well-known work in speculative areas. This is not a judgment on his character or his work, but simply a consideration of how his involvement might be perceived by others.
Once again, I appreciate your dedication to this case and your willingness to engage in this discussion. I hope that we can continue to have a productive dialogue about this important matter.