"I'm gonna get your mother and your sister" could have come from Bob, Brandon, BobJr, or Matt, IMO.
"I'm gonna get your mother and your sister" could have come from Bob, Brandon, BobJr, or Matt, IMO.
I always felt the kids were lying to the Dad to hide their involvement in attracting EN to the home and/or provoking the attack. I think Dad is a blowhard and I don't like him personally, but I think the kids are more to blame for all the misinformation rather than the Dad.
I always felt the kids were lying to the Dad to hide their involvement in attracting EN to the home and/or provoking the attack. I think Dad is a blowhard and I don't like him personally, but I think the kids are more to blame for all the misinformation rather than the Dad.
I always felt the kids were lying to the Dad to hide their involvement in attracting EN to the home and/or provoking the attack. I think Dad is a blowhard and I don't like him personally, but I think the kids are more to blame for all the misinformation rather than the Dad.
Maybe kids are more afraid of Dad than LE? -- that does happen ...... MOO
If you don't know the whole story, or even any of the facts, I strongly recommend you not call media to make your wife's shooting "go viral." That kind of thing will bite you in the butt 9 times out of 10.
JMO
I am toying with the idea that the daughter was never in the car. The only reason she would be in the car would be to support the driving practice story which I think is false.
Maybe it's possible that dad's biggest mistake is simply believing everything his kids say. But IMO dad is knowingly involved in the coverup, and possibly directing it completely. He knew that his wife knew EN. He knew that his kids knew EN. He knew EN's name and address. If mom was in fact buying pills from EN, dad probably knew that too. He reportedly called the media even before he got home -- probably thinking that if he got the family's story out in public first, people would be more inclined to believe it. And he was right -- it seems that some people still believe it was a road rage and that the Meyers have been telling the story correctly. I personally don't understand how anyone can still believe that, but apparently some people do.
Maybe it's possible that dad's biggest mistake is simply believing everything his kids say. But IMO dad is knowingly involved in the coverup, and possibly directing it completely. He knew that his wife knew EN. He knew that his kids knew EN. He knew EN's name and address. If mom was in fact buying pills from EN, dad probably knew that too. He reportedly called the media even before he got home -- probably thinking that if he got the family's story out in public first, people would be more inclined to believe it. And he was right -- it seems that some people still believe it was a road rage and that the Meyers have been telling the story correctly. I personally don't understand how anyone can still believe that, but apparently some people do.
I am toying with the idea that Mom was never in the car myself...but we may never know. [emoji19]
I just watched this video from shortly after the shooting. (I'm not sure of the date, but TM was still alive at this point.)
http://www.fox5vegas.com/video?clipId=11137651
In this video, a neighbor is interviewed. The neighbor says his son heard 3 loud pops followed by a squealing of tires followed by a couple more pops. Who really did fire first there at the cul de sac? I'm not so sure it was EN.
Also in this video, RM says that the silver car followed his wife home and his son came out of the house and returned fire.
Son in the car with mom hunting for the silver car vs. silver car follows mom home and son comes out of house and returns fire. That's a major difference. That's not inadvertently getting a minor detail wrong, like the car was 2-door or 4-door, or it was 11:10 vs. 11:20. That's a significant enough difference that it can only be a lie.
Either the son deliberately lied to his dad immediately after the shooting, or the son told dad the truth and dad deliberately lied right after the shooting. One or the other.
Why would RM or BM lie about BM being in the car with mom? They did feel compelled later on to admit that Brandon was in the car, but what exactly were they trying to cover up here?
The only factor that is missing that makes sense, is the use and/or selling of drugs. Of course, neither party would want to admit to selling or using drugs.
I think the defense attorney still thinks they can get away with a self defense argument (although it would be tenuous) so they are trying to avoid any mention of drugs. Also, the prosecution may not bring it up because it would make the victim look unsympathetic to a jury.
And for right or wrong (mostly wrong though), this kid's appearance will play a big factor to a Clark County jury. There will be an uphill battle to convict him because he is a small framed, tiny, wide eyed, young looking white man. The jury will have sympathy for him.