I have to add my 2 cents about the clothes as well. It's really bothering me.
I do not understand how it is physically possible for her to wear a size 10 jeans, no matter where the waist is. Unless she had a belt, which it sounds like there wasn't one. To put it into perspective - I'm 5 feet even and 105lbs give or take. I wear anywhere from a 3 to a 5. This woman was much thinner than me (5 lbs-ish heavier, almost half a foot taller). This is model thin - ballerina thin. You can see in her face how thin she was. Not an ounce of fat under her skin. I'm sorry but size 10 doesn't make sense when she was a 3 at the most, most likely a 0. It would be like me being about 90 lbs.
I want a waist measurement on the jeans. And the shoe size? Again, 5 ft tall, I wear a 6.5 or 7. That is more likely though, especially since we now know the bruise was not caused by the shoes.
So, IMO something is wrong. I don't think her weight is wrong because of her face. I think the size of the jeans is wrong. It just doesn't make sense. Thats 4 or 5 sizes too big. My soon to be MIL is an 8 and about that height and while she isn't overweight by any means, she is very curvy. Maybe weighs about 140 (guessing here)? She was a 10 for a while.
It would be like putting a stick in a potato sack. Seriously.