Charlie99909
Retired Mt. Rose Researcher
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2010
- Messages
- 383
- Reaction score
- 90
I was going through and looking at the case again. It's been one year since I started this thread and I am amazed at how far it's come. We have all spent a good amount of time on this case.
One thing I noticed that sounded odd was on her namus file,
Clothing on body
A blue Buntees Sportswear" t-shirt, size M, with bottom that had been cut away, blue Levi jeans, blue one-piece bathing suit
Clothing with body
Light blue bikini underwear or bathing suit bottom found in front jeans pocket
Why would she bring bathing suit bottoms if she already had a one piece? I'm thinking her one piece was purchased locally that day. Maybe she didn't come to swim and for whatever reason acquired the one piece suit. Knowing what we know, which granted isn't much, why the extra bottoms? Unless they are;
A- her underwear
Or
B- a second set of bottoms she had for some unknown reason.
They only say bikini styled bottoms. What if they were mens bikini bottoms? It would make sense if she was with a European male or a male who spent time in Europe.
One thing I noticed that sounded odd was on her namus file,
Clothing on body
A blue Buntees Sportswear" t-shirt, size M, with bottom that had been cut away, blue Levi jeans, blue one-piece bathing suit
Clothing with body
Light blue bikini underwear or bathing suit bottom found in front jeans pocket
Why would she bring bathing suit bottoms if she already had a one piece? I'm thinking her one piece was purchased locally that day. Maybe she didn't come to swim and for whatever reason acquired the one piece suit. Knowing what we know, which granted isn't much, why the extra bottoms? Unless they are;
A- her underwear
Or
B- a second set of bottoms she had for some unknown reason.
They only say bikini styled bottoms. What if they were mens bikini bottoms? It would make sense if she was with a European male or a male who spent time in Europe.