Huh. Looks like Denise Beaudin still hasn't been ruled out.
Neither has Audrey Nerenberg, and she has been suggested throughout the thread. Did you submit Denise?Huh. Looks like Denise Beaudin still hasn't been ruled out.
Neither has Audrey Nerenberg, and she has been suggested throughout the thread. Did you submit Denise?
Neither has Audrey Nerenberg, and she has been suggested throughout the thread. Did you submit Denise?
Yes, I did that way back, and I'm fairly certain about it, but I'm not a professional in this matter. Audrey's never been ruled out officially, AFAIK.I would think the statement about the UIDs overlapping teeth and the fact that Audrey had a very large gap between hers would make her an automatic rule out.
CANADA - Canada - Pamela Harvey Rousseau, 23, Greater Sudbury, Ont, Dec 1978
This (IJD) is a case I always come back to. I've come across Pam before, but I don't think in relation to IJD. The most striking similarity is perhaps the teeth, as Pam has been referenced to have 'protruding uppers'. No further mention of her dental work, though (as I think having the gold foil work would be a slam dunk). Canada's Missing | Case details
The height is slight askew, but we know that isn't always accurate, especially in this case where IJD has been speculated to have been deceased for 10-15 yrs prior to discovery. Pam went missing 10 years prior to IJD being found.
I looked further into Pam, and her sisters were interviewed and featured in a book written about unsolved cases in Sudbury, Ontario Canada. They speculated that Pam was killed for having knowledge of a murder that happened a month prior to her disappearance. She was dating a man in a local gang.
Anyway, why she would have been brought across the border and into Rochester, who knows. But she isn't on the rule out list, and she fits a few things from IJD. Trying to get more information, but it's a thought!
Considering that IJD has always been rumored to have gang ties, that's actually another point in favor of a match with Pam. IJD's Doenetwork page 122UFNY shows her teeth, but I can't tell whether they match Pam or not.
k, I might be overstepping WS ToS here, but that NCMEC 3D-scan recon is bugging me. It's so generic and could basically be anyone, so all apologies, but I took the liberty of merging that recon + the old rendring to get a better grasp of how Irondequoit Jane Doe might have looked like IRL.
View attachment 339225
Please do! I look for updates on her quite often, but as you've also observed, there's little to none press on her after that NCMEC recon update spring 2019.Being local to our IJD, there hasn't been any news coverage on her case since early 2019. It was reported then that there had been recent submissions to the University of Arizona for carbon testing on her teeth as well as mineral testing. No follow up has been provided since. I will make it a point to reach out to the department in charge and inquire if there are any results or updates on the testing yet. Worth a shot!
@othramPlease do! I look for updates on her quite often, but as you've also observed, there's little to none press on her after that NCMEC recon update spring 2019.
It would seem wiser to spend money on conducting forensic genealogy on her instead of the mentioned testing, but NY state didn't allow this method until recently, so I guess they just scheduled her up for whatever testing available at the time. Would you mind inquire about possibility of using a fg service to the department you're reaching out to? If we're lucky, she's already an active case somewhere! (@othram, are you being sneaky again? )
Please do! I look for updates on her quite often, but as you've also observed, there's little to none press on her after that NCMEC recon update spring 2019.
It would seem wiser to spend money on conducting forensic genealogy on her instead of the mentioned testing, but NY state didn't allow this method until recently, so I guess they just scheduled her up for whatever testing available at the time. Would you mind inquire about possibility of using a fg service to the department you're reaching out to? If we're lucky, she's already an active case somewhere! (@othram, are you being sneaky again? )
Any update?I called this afternoon and unfortunately no one answered at the Criminal Investigations Unit, but I did leave a lengthy message..so I know we're going into the weekend now, but hopefully we get a call back! I have in my notes to make sure to ask about using fg..it does seem that would be way more efficient than these carbon and mineral tests.
Hadn't heard back and it had been on my to do list to follow up. Just called again right now, and the sergeant in charge of cold cases is not in the office today. But the secretary took down my info and reason for calling, and will get the message to him in the morning. So let's hope there's a call back this time! Fingers crossed!Any update?