- Joined
- Feb 16, 2006
- Messages
- 2,875
- Reaction score
- 186
I would add that the killer suffers from psychosexual arrest and the childlike behaviors he exhibits when living out his fantasies are a result of this deficiency.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would add that the killer suffers from psychosexual arrest and the childlike behaviors he exhibits when living out his fantasies are a result of this deficiency.
from NewsdayMoney fueled drug habit
Amber Costello's rule about staying out of a john's car came after a brutal lesson.
Her roommate Schaller, who helped her with clients, said he could recall her getting into a man's car only once -- after their session was over and he offered her a ride to a convenience store.
"She called me from the side of the Southern State Parkway. Her head was bleeding," Schaller recalled. "He had punched her three times in the face and left her on the side of the road."
Costello told her boyfriend, Bjorn Brodsky, 26, that sex work had been part of her life since she was 17. She was also a heroin addict, according to Schaller, Brodsky and her relatives.
A Wilmington, N.C., native, Costello did not graduate high school, married and divorced twice and bounced around jobs in North Carolina and Florida before moving to New York in late 2009. Schaller, a friend of Costello's sister Kimberly Overstreet and then a commercial fisherman, said he paid for her plane ticket.
She attended a 28-day rehab program at St. Charles Hospital in Port Jefferson, where Brodsky said he met her. Both of them relapsed into drug use by the following spring.
Costello bought a prepaid cellphone and uploaded a Craigslist post advertising herself as a private dancer named Carolina, Brodsky said.
"That phone never stopped ringing," he said.
Schaller allowed her to work from his home. He and Brodsky say they did not act as pimps for Costello. But one of them was usually in another room when she had clients over. There were rules: Clients came to her and paid $200 an hour; she went only as far as she wanted to; and if a client demanded more, she called out for Schaller or Brodsky. The men would make the client leave -- in some cases physically removing him.
"It was a very controlled environment," Schaller said.
By midsummer, Brodsky said, Costello was earning $7,000 a week.
"She would lay the cash down on the table and say, 'Here, you can have $3,000 and I'll take four,' " Brodsky said.
By August, Brodsky was back in rehab. Costello kept living with Schaller until her disappearance the next month. Her vanishing didn't immediately cause alarm, since she had left at other times as well.
But in December, when Costello was finally reported missing by her sister after remains were discovered at Gilgo, a homicide detective called Schaller. The investigator wanted details about her clients, especially regulars, and the last caller who persuaded her to go for a ride.
"It had to be somebody she was comfortable with," Schaller said. "Or maybe all that money just got her in the head."
Not sure how you deduced this, since the pimp's claims are more of an, "oh, btw, the pimp said he got calls, too" In any event, I take issue with the fact that he claims he was called 30 times over eight months, whereas LE confirms that seven calls were made over a period of six weeks immediately following Melissa's disappearance ( link ).
As for the Mickey Mouse bit? LE tracked down the calls of Melissa's clients, and one of her clients had registered their phone to "Mickey Mouse." In other words, perhaps M-squared is the killer, perhaps he's not.
I respectfully disagree. There are reasons to concoct the story, the least being the celebrity angle. He's getting attention, the reporter is telling his story. Moreover, there's the one-upmanship. The sister received 7 calls over a period of six weeks. He claims he received 30 over a period of eight months. That's just over the top. I don't buy it.
Agreed. One only need consider Eminem, to see that sort of thing. My point is not about race per se, rather, dialect being in conflict with alleged age. In other words, the sort of dialect conveyed in that story is more recent and not something that supports the "older white male" claim.
Well, the FBI profile of usual mid-20s white loner over-generalizes with no basis in science, anyway. *shrugs*
That being said, I'll play. Let's say the pimp is telling the truth... even if it's a bit exaggerated. You rightly ponder, why would the perp call the pimp? Calling the family is obvious but why the pimp? The answer to that Q, imnsho, is fairly simple. The perp is marking his territory, so to speak. Letting the pimp know that not only does he have the pimp's girl but he knows enough about the pimp he could show up anytime he pleases. While arguably a veiled threat, the real message is about power. It's the sort of puffing up that males of our species often engage in, even in non-threatening, peace-space.
The "Mickey Mouse" bit originated from the April 24, 2011, Daily Beast article ( link )But as I understood the articles dealing with the phone calls, the Mickey Mouse phone was found tracing one of the pimp calls.
At best, his claim, if true, further cements the suspected psychological markers of the perp. Specifically the dominance-submission dyad. Otherwise put, the validity (or invalidity) of the profile does not hinge on whether (or not) this guy is telling the truth.The problem is, to believe him or not changes the whole profile.
The "Mickey Mouse" bit originated from the April 24, 2011, Daily Beast article ( link )
Detectives and family members combed through her phone records. Lynn discovered that a few calls were made to the escort service James Bond Entertainment. Lynn's fiancé Jeff called the number and spoke to a man who told him that Barthelemy had worked with him on a number of occasions. "He was prickly, like Jeff was bothering him," said Lynn.
A few of the numbers belonged to her regular clients, one of whom was a married man who told police that Barthelemy didn't show up for their scheduled date at a motel in Jersey City.
"He was more worried about his wife finding out than being a suspect in a serial killer case," said the Long Island law-enforcement source. "Her clients were regular Joes. She wasn't working for Heidi Fleiss."
Other numbers were traced to throwaway phones purchased in Manhattan. One of the phones was linked to the name Mickey Mouse.
Those seven were the ones to the sister. The calls to the pimp started later. But as I understood the articles dealing with the phone calls, the Mickey Mouse phone was found tracing one of the pimp calls.
That's the first time, I hear the version that Mickey Mouse was found in the client list. It was always reported in connection to the phone calls from Melissa's cell phone used by the killer. However, I will recheck when I find the time.
Nobody forces you to buy it, it's an estimation thing anyway. But I would estimate the urge of a guy to draw attention in a serial killer case whose business is to draw no attention as pretty low. Unless of course, he would try to prevent to become a suspect in the first place. The problem is, to believe him or not changes the whole profile.
Agreed in both points, Ebonics on an older white guy is hard to believe and thus, either the white or the older part must be wrong. Since I see the victimology similar to serial rapist cases I know, I tend to say, it's the white part that is wrong in here. You appear to tend to the age part. Unfortunately, we have nothing to pin a nail into that detail, so we have to leave it open for now.
Okay, lets join that play then. It would be estuary behavior as usually in all male mammals. Only to a exaggerated point, which includes also ownership of the female and even threatens the personal space. Which reinforces it, as you already said, from estuary behavior to generalized domination behavior. However, there is a sublt difference between power and control and the addition out of them is domination. This extreme domination behavior would indicate a narcissistic (NPD) complex or simply a big inferiority complex that needs over-compensation. Given the fact, that all four connected victims are white females but have otherwise not much in common as far as it comes to their appearance and that the pimp is also Caucasian, that paints a pretty ugly picture. Did you look up the Waldo guy?
We've been through this over and over again months ago in the older discussions. I do not have the desire (nor the time) to go back and dig up all of the actual references so you'll have to take the word of those of us who did the research. Here are the facts that you will uncover if you do the due dillegence;
- One of DOZENS of numbers on her cell phone were traced back to throw-away phones.
- ONE of the throwaway phones was even registered to the name "MICKEY MOUSE"
- The calls to the boyfriend/pimp were never substantiated by law enforcement as being harrassing phone calls.
- Law enforcement has never released a statement confirming or denying that they are aware what phone number the SK made those calls from. (so we do not know if the Mickey Mouse registered phone was the one used to call the pimp/boyfriend).
As far as motive for lying, about these calls, there is clearly an obvious reason;
What if the pimp/boyfriend KNOWS the serial killer on a friendly and/or business-related basis?
And what if he has received up to thirty "friendly" or business-related phone calls from the serial killer after his girl went missing (rather than tormenting)?
And what if he was afraid that the SK was sloppy and may have used the same throw-away phone (or the victim's phone) to make all of those calls to him?
Would not a perfect cover up to explain to police why the Serial Killer's phone number is on the pimp's phone records is to fabricate this nonsense story about the calls being tormenting?
Think about it!
I bet a Honda Ridgeback would be the perfect truck to dump those bodies in the bramble and not get stuck. That is one amazing truck!
Acutally, this is the primary reason I am leaning toward the outlier scenario. Simply bc there is not much notably in common between the victims. I do believe he has a type but I do not think it has to do with looks, or even age, for that matter. Moreover, while they may use social networking to connect to their marks, they do not use classifieds, online or otherwise. Nor do they pick up street walkers. The primary reason being, they are hunting for a particular type. Hence, their hunting ground is generally sex-related events. Said events can be anything from your G-rated meet and greets, to X-rated sex parties, and everything in between (i.e., classes, exhibits, clubs, etc). It is these sorts of places where they identify and case their marks. Outliers prefer sex parties and to some extent, sex clubs over the G-rated events. Primarily bc their prospective marks are unknowingly auditioning for them. The outlier not only gets to see their potential marks IRL, they see them in the raw... where they can evaluate other criteria. Except that, the criteria has nothing really to do with physique, body type, etcetera. They're looking for other stuff. For example, is she into kink? And if so, what kind? Is she an exhibitionist? Importantly, is she a screamer? That's the sort of thing outliers look for. And that is the sort of thing that cannot be truly discerned from online, or even over the phone, interaction.What do you think about the victimology, especially appearance of the victims?
Acutally, this is the primary reason I am leaning toward the outlier scenario. Simply bc there is not much notably in common between the victims. I do believe he has a type but I do not think it has to do with looks, or even age, for that matter. Moreover, while they may use social networking to connect to their marks, they do not use classifieds, online or otherwise. Nor do they pick up street walkers. The primary reason being, they are hunting for a particular type. Hence, their hunting ground is generally sex-related events. Said events can be anything from your G-rated meet and greets, to X-rated sex parties, and everything in between (i.e., classes, exhibits, clubs, etc). It is these sorts of places where they identify and case their marks. Outliers prefer sex parties and to some extent, sex clubs over the G-rated events. Primarily bc their prospective marks are unknowingly auditioning for them. The outlier not only gets to see their potential marks IRL, they see them in the raw... where they can evaluate other criteria. Except that, the criteria has nothing really to do with physique, body type, etcetera. They're looking for other stuff. For example, is she into kink? And if so, what kind? Is she an exhibitionist? Importantly, is she a screamer? That's the sort of thing outliers look for. And that is the sort of thing that cannot be truly discerned from online, or even over the phone, interaction.
So let me bring this to the point: You don't like thinking about the possibilities of other theories and therefore jump in and sell yours as fact with which I have now to agree. Because the last part of your sermon, beginning "there is one reason, he knows the SK" is pure assumption. From there, it goes to the calls (you otherwise claimed that they didn't even happen) were all friendly business calls from your resident SK. Yeah, right! And I really love this "perfect cover" part. Wouldn't it been a perfect cover for an SK to join some amateur boards and smack down any theory that could lead in another way than the usual already proven as wrong theories by insulting and arrogant posts? Tell me, Seaslug, wouldn't it?
I admittedly never bought the pimp's claim. After all, he claims an older "drunk" white male called him 30 times over a period of six months, and among other things, said, "I know where you be at." ( link ) Yeah, right. Older white males regularly resort to ebonic-like vernacular. Sure they do. For reference, from July 12th through August 26th, the killer made weekly calls to Melissa's little sister. Calls which LE confirmed, btw. Otherwise put, is the pimp's claim believable? Imnsho? Not in the least little bit.