This interview is well worth watching, perhaps especially for those who believe the State overcharged Skylar, and/or that aspects of the State's case were unethical.
He is asked repeatedly why the State didn't "hit the reset button" after the charred bones expert opinion was retracted. Why the State didn't at least withdraw the intentional murder charge, why they persisted with the accusation at trial Skylar burned her baby, rather than admitting she falsely confessed to that.
(And, I totally disagree one has to be an attorney to have an informed opinion about the State's ethics. In any case, given the huge differences between the practices of civil and criminal law, an attorney simply by virtue of being an attorney does not an expert in all areas of law make.
For example, I don't know any civil attorneys, including my DH, who would feel comfortable asserting they are familiar with very many aspects of criminal law, prosecutions, and trials at all, much less singularly qualified as experts.
Last, and definitely not least. It's our legal system, our lives the State has the power to disrupt or destroy, and imo it's very much our responsibility to hold the State accountable if we believe the State has abused that power.