My apologies if I misspoke. I do not necessarily believe he died in a bar full of people. The bar was closing and people were leaving. In Columbus, closing time is 2:30 am and usually at 2 am they start clearing out pretty quickly since 2-2:15 am is last call. The police saw Brian go back in the bar with surveillance, so we know he didn't come back out the front, right? Brian could not have been the only person that knew or used that back exit during this time. At least a few people could have used the same path and noticed Brian, and with the media coverage in the area of this case, someone would have came forward. But no one has or at least we have not been told this fact. I used to live near the Ugly Tuna when this happened and now only live about 10ish minutes away, so I have following the case since and wish we had some answers.It doesn't seem like the simplest solution to suggest that he died in a busy bar with possibly hundreds of people around and no one noticed. To me, Occam's razor leads one to conclude that he left through the exit that had a camera but whose footage had been overwritten by the time the police requested it (as security claimed). It was either that exit or the construction exit without a camera.
I remember reading that the same thing happened at a lot of places around High Street when police requested their camera footage--it had either been overwritten or the police were told that the camera wasn't working.
The lack of surveillance footage is a factor of the timing of the investigation relative to Brian's disappearance. Some businesses with cameras also don't want to be bothered with helping a police investigation for various reasons, e.g. a lack of time, they don't know how to access the footage, or they're afraid of providing self-incriminating footage on unrelated issues (even as simple as city ordinance violations).
Last edited: