IYO?So she has the money to pay for this lawyer?
IYO?So she has the money to pay for this lawyer?
That is a very good question.jmo but why George’s documents he already had legal custody didn’t he?
Just the fact that the State has "delayed sentencing" speaks volumes to me.I really believe RN may have sealed this case for the State. I would bet there is some kind of signed deposition telling all she knew, to bring about any plea negotiations for her. Something that will not be made public until needed. In the plea of guilty journal entry where it talks about any promises made, it states See Defendant's Agreement, evidently not public document. We just have to wait to see what else is out there. IMO
Betty, I don't believe Rita actually "pled" yesterday, did she? My understanding is that is what she has agreed to do. Anyone? JMO
It was when he realized it wasn't just a phase, that she wasn't coming back, that he started planning murder.Thanks for sharing your opinion.
You say something very interesting quote:
"Jake didn't give a rat's rear about seeing SW again. He did it because he hated Hanna for having the strength to leave him and move on with her life without him in it."
Now this is interesting because I've always thought about the Case as being all about Jake and Angela being insanely obsessed over custody, which they were of course, but there is more to it, from what you say.
That it could have been even more important to Jake that he stop Hanna from moving on with her life and loving other men. The classic "if I can't have her no one can."
I'll look for the article if anyone wants to see it but there is a MSM article that quotes Jake as saying that he thought "Hanna leaving was just a phase."
It was when he realized it wasn't just a phase, that she wasn't coming back, that he started planning murder.
They had picked out a specific date to get married in August 2015 and instead Hanna called off the wedding and was pregnant with another man's baby at that time. In the fall of 2015 she sent the bio father the ultrasound photo
and was in a serious relationship with another man. Even though she had broken up with the bio dad months earlier, she still didn't want to go back to Jake and chose somebody else to be with and to have in the new baby's life.
By that January of 2016 it was crystal clear to Jake that this was no phase, that for sure she wasn't coming back to him. According to the indictments they were planning the murders at this time.
So what you are saying really strongly is supported by this timeline of events.
Before the "laser focus" I thought Chris Sr. was the main target, after arrests I thought it was mostly about custody, but now I'm wondering if you could be right about what your saying about Jake.
Hummmm.....Opinion without links but will look for links if anyone wants to see articles.
YES. I agree. All documents have been sealed per Angenette Levy (reporter).I really believe RN may have sealed this case for the State. I would bet there is some kind of signed deposition telling all she knew, to bring about any plea negotiations for her. Something that will not be made public until needed. In the plea of guilty journal entry where it talks about any promises made, it states See Defendant's Agreement, evidently not public document. We just have to wait to see what else is out there. IMO
IDK. Most of the time if you can't pay for an attorney the judge appoints an attorney to represent you. That is how it is always been as far as I know.I have only given my opinion on the matter. I have no way to know who is paying her attorney fees. In your opinion how is she paying for this attorney to do all the work?
Jmo my big question is why does Gerlach want the recording still?
IYO?So she has the money to pay for this lawyer?
Great post, and I hope you are right. I hope Rita gave them what they needed.I really believe RN may have sealed this case for the State. I would bet there is some kind of signed deposition telling all she knew, to bring about any plea negotiations for her. Something that will not be made public until needed. In the plea of guilty journal entry where it talks about any promises made, it states See Defendant's Agreement, evidently not public document. We just have to wait to see what else is out there. IMO
Good call. I didn’t see his name amongst the court appointed lawyers or public defenders when I looked a little bit but you’re probably right. I’ll look again later. ThanksIDK. Most of the time if you can't pay for an attorney the judge appoints an attorney to represent you. That is how it is always been as far as I know.
JMO
GW4 and his son's mother regarding custody is a whole different story of twists and turns. I do believe he had custody of BW. That has made me question what the 3 forged custody papers/documents are exactly besides SWs. ???? I'm fairly new to WS so I do not know if GW4 and his ex were discussed, so I just will leave it like this.That is a very good question.
How did G4 receive full custody of his child and was able to take the child across international borders through Canada?
Are there legal custody documents?
Was Bruce Dailey also the attorney that crafted the custody documents for G4?
Did the mother of G4's child agree to this custody arrangement?
Or, was she threatened in any way, like HMR might have been?
All JMO, but good questions that need to be answered...
JMO, MOO, etc.
Jmo I’ve haven’t seen where it was proven that “those documents” were used for that yet. Jmo
Sorry, I think she just didn't want to go to jail for a long time. I sure hope AC gets RN in front of a judge, steno and camera and gets her deposed about anything and everything. People who can slaughter 8 human beings in the middle of the night in their beds, some with infants sleeping with them, can have someone murdered.I agree, Raisin, and I will be looking at her as a victim also. I don't think her conscience could take it anymore so she did the right thing.
If I remember correctly, A Notarized document must have two witnesses that are not related to anyone in the document. Also a Notary may not act in the case of family. AI wonder who the witnesses were? I assume they have been contacted by LE.
Anything I have had notarized only required the Notary and the people signing the paper. The Notary must witness the people sign the papers. The Notary's seal and signature are legal proof the papers were signed in the Notary's presence by the people named on the papers.