Don't understand your question.
He said he purchased a night scope for hunting raccoons at night, not a mask for hunting them.
Let's just leave this topic alone for now. There will be more information coming out soon.
Don't understand your question.
He said he purchased a night scope for hunting raccoons at night, not a mask for hunting them.
Something is up with Angela Wagner trial, Billy and George Wagner the 4th attorneys has already filed for all information from Edward Jacob Wagner plea agreement for their on defense but the only thing Angela Wagner attorneys has filed for is money $, IMO Angela Wagner will take Life without Parole.
Who here would like to see AW get those phone privileges restored?
And fast! (wink, wink)
MO I feel sure she will say all kinds of terribly incriminating things...
If I were the state I would be very tempted to let her have those privileges back to see what she said.
I agree, I think the last thing she wants to do is sit in a court room and have to look at pictures of the victims and their homes. Listen to how many stupid mistakes that just she alone made that got them caught. To have to hear that they are not in fact masterminds but amateurs. She won’t do it.Something is up with Angela Wagner trial, Billy and George Wagner the 4th attorneys has already filed for all information from Edward Jacob Wagner plea agreement for their on defense but the only thing Angela Wagner attorneys has filed for is money $, IMO Angela Wagner will take Life without Parole.
Something is up with Angela Wagner trial, Billy and George Wagner the 4th attorneys has already filed for all information from Edward Jacob Wagner plea agreement for their on defense but the only thing Angela Wagner attorneys has filed for is money $, IMO Angela Wagner will take Life without Parole.
I know a lot of evidence that has already been made public by the Prosecution shows how heavily involved AW was in the entire process of the murders, but since the other acts filed in BW's case back in April of this year lists "instance of Defendant threatening Angela Jo Wagner with a gun", do you think AW will try to claim she only went along with everything because she was afraid of BW?
https://www.websleuths.com/forums/attachments/upload_2021-4-5_15-30-18-png.291435/
These are the 3 recent requests for Expert/Expenses to be paid in AW case and the documents that go along with them.
**Moderator approved documents obtained from courtview.**
06/23/2021 REQUEST FOR COURT-PAID EXPERTS AND/OR EXPENSES FILED
06/24/2021 REQUEST FOR COURT-PAID EXPERTS AND/OR EXPENSES FILED
07/06/2021 REQUEST FOR COURT-PAID EXPERT EXPENSES FILED
I know a lot of evidence that has already been made public by the Prosecution shows how heavily involved AW was in the entire process of the murders, but since the other acts filed in BW's case back in April of this year lists "instance of Defendant threatening Angela Jo Wagner with a gun", do you think AW will try to claim she only went along with everything because she was afraid of BW?
https://www.websleuths.com/forums/attachments/upload_2021-4-5_15-30-18-png.291435/
So it was over a year ago that they were reviewing at least 13 possible other suspects for Angela's defense. So now what? Did these alternate suspects commit the crimes with Jake? This confession of Jakes sends the other suspects theory pretty much down the drain I would imagine.
Background on alternative suspect. (2-1-20)
Review of discovery relative to alternative suspects. (2-3-20)
Background on alternative suspect D. (2-9-20)
Review of discovery - background - criminal history of suspect F. (2-10-20)
Background on alternative suspect G. (2-19-20)
Background on alternative suspect H. (4-2-20)
Background on alternative suspect I. (4-28-20)
Background on alternative suspect J. (5-16-20)
Background on alternative suspect K. (5-21-20)
Background on alternative suspect L. (5-31-20)
Background on alternative suspect M. (6-15-20)
**Moderator approved documents obtained from courtview.**
My apologies for my earlier post on this subject. I thought it would be okay since that website was specifically named in the court document. How do I contact a moderator for clarification prior to posting something I'm unsure about?Mod Note/Reminder:
Since Topix is not an approved source, and not permitted to be referenced on WebSleuths, additional speculation around it’s entry in the discovery document shouldn’t be discussed on thread.
Thanks for understanding,
Tiff
For clarity- What document or link does this information go with?
Thanks
My apologies for my earlier post on this subject. I thought it would be okay since that website was specifically named in the court document. How do I contact a moderator for clarification prior to posting something I'm unsure about?