Covert Operative
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2021
- Messages
- 1,560
- Reaction score
- 9,104
I guess my point is really about an unrealistically high burden of proof that's been artificially inflated by forensic expectations appeal precedent law and jury nullification. Things like dna started off as a tool to crack cases disprove allibies identify unknown parties. But over time the csi effect has become a pre requisite and that runs counter to justice. When there's no useable dna at the scene or a killer is proven to have been there but did not leave dna, it becomes more likely the crime will be unsolved or murder will get acquittal or mistrial. This murder case is extremely strong. We've got motive means opportunity murder weapons witnesses wire taps codefendefendant testimony vehicles cyber evidence. We dont have g4s dna and a videotape of the crime and some weird off the wall statement that g4 was protecting jake from Billy while Jake and Billy murdered an entire innocent family
And given everything that has happened g4 still has a chance of getting off and wont take a deal because of it. If I were him under these circumstances I wouldn't either. But not a serial killer either. My point is it's too easy for ppl to avoid justice in cases where guilt is absolute
Yes, I understood your point and it was/is well taken. You said what was the how and why, and I believe the how and why is partly due to JW. I do not think G4 has a chance of getting off but he may have a chance of something lesser like his mommy did.
There are more weird off the wall statements than the one you mention.
Do you have the link to the statement as I would like to read it again or perhaps direct me as how to find it from where you got it from. Thanks
Last edited: