I still dont understand why she only got 30 hard years before being eligible for parole. Unless they needed her to corroborate JWs proffer and/or she dimed out prior bad acts/murders unaccounted for. Jmo and speculation.
That's odd. Isn't she from NE Ohio or recently retired? Or both?
I like Reader. I'm a big fan. Personally, I think a 3 day suspended sentence would have been fine for him.
I think AW may have gave information to close other cold cases. I still don't agree with the 30 years but she gave up something valuable and I personally feel it was more than collaborating JW's proffer. MMO
MO
I think they would have liked to make 4 deals, the cost of the trial will be exorbitant, never mind all the costs the county and state has already spent, their is only so much money to go around, AW and her attys must have bargained hard for her deal, she will be an old woman if she lives to the end of her sentence, she also bolsters the states case, and IMO juries occasionally go off piste and they really do not want to have to redo the trials again,
Absolutely no comparison to the range of emotions the surviving R and G loved ones will be feeling, that is for sure.
The R family over shadows the G family at times. I hope they get to give an impact statement. A few years back I read posts from HG mom a few years back on a social media platform. I haven't seen anything since.
I agree. 30 years is a sweet deal. As determined as A.C. Is to bring justice in this case, I feel that A.W. gave up something pretty heavy. I think ole gal gave up her husband. There is mention of past threats of murder and possibly murder.
Right. Hannah Gilley's family members also could speak at sentencing, giving a victim impact statement.
Oh cool cats, the thought of how this Mother felt makes me want to vomit. As a mother and grandmother, it completely turns my stomach inside out. I wish there were some word of comfort to offer this mother, but, there is not. I don’t believe anything will ever be able to comfort her. As for motive? Well J.W said that H.R. was exposing their daughter to inappropriate people and situations. Ok, well get some proof to back it up and let’s go to court. I’m sure she wasn’t exposing her to anything worse than what they were exposing her to. Money doesn’t make you a good person or parent! So J.W had a sexual relationship with someone underage. I’m sure a judge would be more concerned about the child’s safety than an underage sexual relationship. A relationship that both families agreed with. He may have been reprimanded, but I assure you the child’s safety would have been top priorities for the court. Motive? It was pure outrage jealousy! She no longer wanted him! This had nothing to do with his daughter. How could it have? He was willing to look his daughter in the face for the rest of his life and bold face lie to her about her mother’s murder. That right there shows 100% no concern for the child! My opinions only.
I think you may be right about possibly more murder(s), AW had something good to offer and proof.
I hope impact statements will be allowed. If so I hope there are statements from HG mom, JM and BJM, HR fiancee, TR and especially Miss Geneva if she is able.
Agreeing to testify against her spouse? She does not legally have to do so. I'm a bit behind, but, I do not believe she was there that night. I think she stayed with the children. Those two things might have given her a lighter sentence, and, consider her age. If she testifies, and was cleared of being there that that night, she will soon be 52. She'd go up for parole at 81 ish, if I understand correctly.
Agree to both of your points.
