He's probably being cursed to high Heaven! I'd guess he was already well-known as a big rat, who'd throw someone under the bus, to get out of a so little as a parking ticket.
BBMWere they all legal to own in the state of Ohio? CR1 had an impressive number as well. Lots of collectors out there too. Iirc, the Ws also hunted game such as wild boar. HMR asked permission to go one trip
The only one I saw that was of special interest, to me, under G4's name: SKS 7.62. 39
Under JW's name: Colt 1911 22
To me, the ammo and firearms were an example of sensory overload.
IANA firearms expert, but, I have general knowledge, as an owner. Just my thoughts, because firearms, calibers, generations, terminology, etc...can get confusing. Especially if one is not familiar with firearms, and even if one is.
I personally would have used no photos of shells that didn't match earlier testimony provided by Ballistics, and I'd have highlighted firearms from the list, that Ballistics could match to those shells. In his testimony today, the agent says the shell, on the shelf, was of interest because a 22 long rifle was used. @7:09:00 of Day 17.
Agent White's, earlier testimony, states that the shells from DR's and FR's homes, were .22lr and after much research, discovered to be used in a Walther Colt 1911 (a semi rimfire type of pistol):
Law & Crime - Sept 12, 2022
Ballistics Testimony
Lots of shells, lists of firearms, and evidence of target shooting, was merely boring. Point out what matched up with ballistics, to what was on G4's list, and have your data straight. I may be the only one over saturated, and annoyed by details such as this, but this today, was only one example over the course of the trial.
Were they all legal to own in the state of Ohio? CR1 had an impressive number as well. Lots of collectors out there too. Iirc, the Ws also hunted game such as wild boar. HMR asked permission to go one trip
The only one I saw that was of special interest, to me, under G4's name: SKS 7.62. 39
Under JW's name: Colt 1911 22
To me, the ammo and firearms were an example of sensory overload.
IANA firearms expert, but, I have general knowledge, as an owner. Just my thoughts, because firearms, calibers, generations, terminology, etc...can get confusing. Especially if one is not familiar with firearms, and even if one is.
I personally would have used no photos of shells that didn't match earlier testimony provided by Ballistics, and I'd have highlighted firearms from the list, that Ballistics could match to those shells. In his testimony today, the agent says the shell, on the shelf, was of interest because a 22 long rifle was used. @7:09:00 of Day 17.
Agent White's, earlier testimony, states that the shells from DR's and FR's homes, were .22lr and after much research, discovered to be used in a Walther Colt 1911 (a semi rimfire type of pistol):
Law & Crime - Sept 12, 2022
Ballistics Testimony
Lots of shells, lists of firearms, and evidence of target shooting, was merely boring. Point out what matched up with ballistics, to what was on G4's list, and have your data straight. I may be the only one over saturated, and annoyed by details such as this, but this today, was only one example over the course of the trial.
Jurors appear restless as well.
I forget the guys name, it is Billy’s lawyer the gray head guy. The one that always does the talking in Billy’s hearings. The skinny girl with the long brown hair with him was involved in that cop case too.
One reason, is to preserve the record for a potential appeal. If it's found that the prosecution was out of bounds, then that could aid an appeal. They can't object for no reason. There has to be grounds. The judge has to approve or deny based on those grounds. Just doing their job.
AC introduced those Hannah FB messages yesterday through Tabitha. She doesn't need to do it again today.
Listening to BW I find my brain is always 4-5 seconds behind. Now if there's a breath needed, I'm in luck and ready for more...no breath, then there's rewind.
IMO-some of the FB messages AC wanted today were from some other people. A girl and boy's name I hadn't heard before.
Ha! tell that to my nephew who put a bullet on some rail road tracks when he was about 10 to see what would happen if a train ran over it. I don't know what kind of bullet. My oldest brother did a lot of deer hunting though. A train came by and ran over it. My nephew ended up having surgery because bullet fragments hit him in the stomach and side. Thankfully he survived to pull many other stupid stunts. Come to think of it I think he was the one who threw a bullet into our campfire while we were out hunting that exploded and hit my sister in the arm with fragments. Don't worry she just got a small scar, but has whined about it for about 50 years now. lol
George was always the unknown for us. He never gave an interview with the media, and not many photos taken of him. We caught flashes of him trailing after Billy and Jake mostly with his head lowered. He just seemed to quietly go about his own business leaving us with a giant question mark about him. We have tried to figure him out for years now, why he would get involved and risk his own son to get custody for his brother.
Mark Collins. He represents a lot of LE in Franklin County. Rated as one of the best defense attorneys in Ohio.
I said I wasn't sure who she was talking to as I was trying to get some work done, I simply stated that the way the judge was looking at her i thought the shyte was gonna hit the fan,
Yup. When you owe restitution, child support, court costs, money to victims etc... They always take a certain amount out of your commissary account. It is a certain percentage, they leave you something so you can buy a few things and make some phone calls.
She just got frustrated at the defense and was a short a couple of times. Nothing important, I just LOL'ed.
Is that the Joel Jenkins case?
