OH Pike County: 8 in Rhoden Family Murdered Over Custody Issue 4 Members Wagner Family Arrested#41

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Could be because the defense asked to see the receipts jmo

If you're talking about the BPVs, I believe the defense asked the Special Prosecutor what the "origin" of those were...i.e., where they came from. In other words, he was digging for information. JMO
 
Could be because the defense asked to see the receipts jmo

They already have that info, IIRC. It's been turned over to them in discovery. Defense is asking to see the transcript of the GJ testimony of FW.

They argued they’d requested transcripts of Wagner’s testimony in front of a grand jury that happened before they were hired. The attorneys argue the transcripts will provide context of Wagner’s answers and the questions asked during her testimony.

BBM

Purchase of bulletproof vests at center of charges against Wagner matriarch

FW's attorneys aren't arguing about who purchased the BPV's, they're trying to say that FW had a hearing problem and may have replied in error. Her reply is what they're questioning.

They'll need to prove that, though, but they have plenty of time ahead of them as this case proceeds.

Owen also brought to light that Wagner’s claims that she has impaired hearing and was having difficulty understanding questions at the time of her testimony that he says led to the obstruction and perjury charges.

Canepa argued Owen had not requested transcripts, but confirmation on the testimony leading to the charges against Wagner. She said she handed over a disk that contained the contents of the demand for discovery Thursday morning.


Owen requested a transcript be provided as soon as possible and the judge set a deadline of Jan. 31 barring any delays.

The judge said he may need time to review the transcripts before they are made available to the defense.

I'm beginning to get an idea of how FW's attorney, James Owen, operates. He doesn't make a request for something to the prosecution until he's in the courtroom. Then he makes a big dramatic play for the camera to make it seem like the prosecution is doing something wrong. Oy. What a pro.

JMO
 
Last edited:
Listening to a crime being planned and not reporting it to LE might be a crime. Planning to kill the Ohio AG and county sheriff would be considered a crime in most places. JMO

Have you ever heard someone say “I could just choke so n so”? It is a crime to choke someone, so are you guilty of not calling the police? Ever rode with someone who ran a red light? Did you report them? If not do you believe you committed a crime?

If you say you want to hurt me to me, then you can be guilty of terroristic threats. If you tell your friend you want to hurt me, it is speech only.

Unless the plot to harm someone contains some action, not saying harm itself, there isn’t a crime. Other then threats to harm the president, discussing revenge isn’t a crime. Bad at it may seem.
 
I could see a scenario of purchases via Amazon going back to 2014 followed by, "I didn't purchase that, my account must have been hacked."

It’s possible someone has access to her account. My daughter has used mine before. If F buys feed from Amazon, she might not even look at her monthly statement. Idk
 
Did she buy them? I can’t find info that she did.
I thought the prosecutor said she lied about the BPVs found in her sons room.
I don’t think they stated what the lie was. Just that it was regarding 2 bpv found in her sons room at her home. The defense did ask to see the receipts for them and the defense said if the prosecutor even has copies of receipts for them. Jmo
 
It’s possible someone has access to her account. My daughter has used mine before. If F buys feed from Amazon, she might not even look at her monthly statement. Idk

All 4 of her relations were charged with hacking computers, online accounts, etc. If her accounts were hacked, it was done by someone in the Wagner 4. Her attorneys will need to provide proof of that, though. jmo
 
All 4 of her relations were charged with hacking computers, online accounts, etc. If her accounts were hacked, it was done by someone in the Wagner 4. Her attorneys will need to provide proof of that, though.

I didn't mean did they hack F,I thought maybe she allowed them to use her account.
Otherwise, as you suggest, that would be theft charges, brought by her, right?
 
They already have that info, IIRC. It's been turned over to them in discovery. Defense is asking to see the transcript of the GJ testimony of FW.



BBM

Purchase of bulletproof vests at center of charges against Wagner matriarch

FW's attorneys aren't arguing about who purchased the BPV's, they're trying to say that FW had a hearing problem and may have replied in error. Her reply is what they're questioning.

They'll need to prove that, though, but they have plenty of time ahead of them as this case proceeds.





I'm beginning to get an idea of how FW's attorney, James Owen, operates. He doesn't make a request for something to the prosecution until he's in the courtroom. Then he makes a big dramatic play for the camera to make it seem like the prosecution is doing something wrong. Oy. What a pro.

JMO
Not according to Owens he stated he had asked for stuff weeks ago. The other day I forget which hearing maybe George but I got the feeling the prosecutors are really trying to drag their feet when it comes to turning over evidence. Jmo
 
I don’t know if she is guilty of lying or not yet, but the charge is over one lie. If the bpv was purchased for the murders why only two and not four. I think they are basically arguing over when they were purchased. Jmo

Maybe there are four of them and only two are being discussed about the GJ testimony.
 
I don’t think they stated what the lie was. Just that it was regarding 2 bpv found in her sons room at her home. The defense did ask to see the receipts for them and the defense said if the prosecutor even has copies of receipts for them. Jmo

Myland, did you catch the part abt the BPVs found in son’s room? I thought they asked her about them & she denied knowledge but they have proof she knew. I heard the same regarding rcpts.
 
All 4 of her relations were charged with hacking computers, online accounts, etc. If her accounts were hacked, it was done by someone in the Wagner 4. Her attorneys will need to provide proof of that, though. jmo

My point was a circle of finger pointing among the Wagner 4, and Fredericka or her deceased husband. This is a speculation only.
 
Last edited:
Maybe there are four of them and only two are being discussed about the GJ testimony.
Maybe but that doesn’t make sense really why would prosecutors ask only about two if they found four. Jmo
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
193
Guests online
321
Total visitors
514

Forum statistics

Threads
609,133
Messages
18,249,944
Members
234,543
Latest member
Feelingstoned31
Back
Top