Guys, the towing of the cars doesn't mean they have anything to do with the crime. In my opinion it's part of fully processing the crime scene. They HAVE TO DO THAT and here's why. Let's say they end up arresting a few perps and it goes to trial. If they haven't thoroughly searched and examined everything on that property...including all vehicles...then the defense can accuse the prosecution of not doing a proper thorough job. I can see a defense attorney pulling out a bag of cocaine and lying and saying...this bag was found in X car on that property that they never even searched! Thereby he creates reasonable doubt an a competing narrative of the prosecution's case which could confuse the jury and provide reasonable doubt. Because of this it is law enforcement's duty to examine every single thing at a crime scene...they can't leave any stone untouched so that they don't provide an easy out for the defense team. A number of people on this forum know that I believe the perps are the group of kids that have had run-ins with the Rhodens. Processing the cars the way they have been in no way hurts that theory...in fact it strengthens it if anything because if they really thought these cars were an intrinsic part of the crime...they would have been taking evidence off of them two weeks ago...not the last two days.
............
Absolutely !! But I would also add that LE wouldn't want those assets disappearing once they relinquish the crime scenes. It makes sense to me that the State would wish to pursue a "forfeiture of assets" if a case can be made for those assets having been acquired from the proceeds of crime, so removing them for forensic examination serves a two-fold purpose ...