AF555
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2016
- Messages
- 245
- Reaction score
- 23
Ok, I am not trying to dominate, but I sit here and read and research these candidates and the information I glean, ,I am
passing on to you. So here goes, My research has proven, from the Pike County register's office. That Charlie is
a candidate for Sheriff to fill the unexpired term of the former sheriff. He is running as a democrat. Also running as
a republican is Mr.Soushter.When the two ran for sheriff in 2008, they ran against the sheriff who won and resigned
May of 2005.. The first election in 2008' Charlie ran as an independent and the sheriff who won ran as a democrat.
Mr. Shouster ran as a republican...As I read various comments, the public has been aware of Mr.Shouster's intent
to complain about Mr Reader changing parties in this election..Someone posted that the media filed a complaint
that Charlie was violating the law by using a county vehicle to politick .All of this is common when the incumbent
has all the marbles in the game. Some poster said that the T.V. Reporter was an outsider and could not be trusted
with the truth.All the reporter has to do is go to the County Comissioners and ask them to talk.I am sure they will
run over her for the opportunity to be on camera.Charlie is not entirely safe from the media.
The other bit of strange behavior is that Charlie gave the orders to impound all evidence...He, then, installed a camera.
Why? Then he assigns a deputy to guard the impound lot 24/7...I am asking myself, If the deputy is guarding the
Impound lot 24/7 what is the camera for? I can't tell you for certain but I have an opinion. That T.V. Reporter was asking
about that camera and Charlie cut her off...If I violated TOSH, please forGive me. More to come
What's your opinion on the reason for the camera being there?