Snipped for focus
Now imagine the skill involved in planning and executing the murders of 8 people in 4 different locations in one night, in the space of a few hours at best.
I agree these murders took extensive planning. However, I dont believe murdering them all in one night would have taken extensive skill, for a couple reasons. 1) It happened. And over 2 years later, the murders are still unsolved. 2) 3 of the 4 locations were extremely close together. 3) the locations are extremely rural, without street lights, little traffic (from my understanding), and part of a culture where neighbors out in the country mind their own business.
I dont believe it takes much skill to ambush trailers on large wooded lots in the pitch dark of night. CRsrs home and even FRs, both had an unbelievable amount of clutter surrounding them that would have provided many locations for people to hide in the darkness.
That's highly unusual, operating at a high level of both skill, mental focus, discipline, planning and physical endurance. Its not the same as walking into a room, mowing down a crowd of people, then escaping. It's stalking, approaching, gaining entry, subduing dogs, finding victims quickly (in some cases fighting and subduing them), killing them (in the dark), cleaning up the crime scene, checking for cops, then escaping only to drive down the road and do it again, and again, and again. All without making a mistake or alerting witnesses who could call police.
I agree, skill and mental focus were definitely needed to commit this crime. However, the skill could have been based on using simple blindsided betrayal by someone the family would have never expected. Mental focus is easy to achieve if someone has enough anger, hate, and determination inside of them. Is it possible this mental focus was something that was slowly built over a period of years, until it finally erupted?
What types of things leads to such anger, hate, and pure evil?
As far as killing them in the dark, what we dont know is-did the killer(s) flip on light switches when they walked in bedrooms? Or perhaps they had headlamps and lasers on their guns? We do know CR & GR were probably awake or perhaps CRs dogs started barking (waking him and GR) and he, himself let the dogs outside before he was ambushed? I tend to lean towards the former, those two men were awake. Or maybe the murder(er) was already inside CRs home with him and GR. Someone he at least semi trusted and would never have expected to ambush and murder him and his entire family.
I tend to believe escaping down the road would have been difficult IF these homes were in a city setting. But again, being so rural, it made it that much easier for whoever did this to go unnoticed. As most small towns go, LE doesnt tend to patrol the outskirts and country roads as frequently as they do the main roads.
No, I don't think people who have no experience at this level of criminal activity could have pulled this off. I don't care how many deer or squirrels they may have killed in the woods. Wild game doesn't live in houses, with guns nearby and cell phones they can use to call 911. They don't fight back or try to take your gun away from you.
Its true wild game doesnt live in houses, BUT It seems it would be easier to kill wild game if they were in captivity versus running wild. Walk into a deer farm, youll see a whole herd of deer in their fenced grazing enclosure, but if you walk out into the wild, youll be lucky to see one. Hunting requires extreme skill and patience.
The Rhoden murders were a master class in pre-planned executions. That 2 yrs later there have been no arrests if more confirmation. There's no way a bunch of meth-ed up local yokels pulled this off. No one is that lucky. CR1 would have killed or seriously wounded them when he fought them at his trailer.
Absolutely 100% these murders were pre planned executions. But, meth. Woah. Meth is a powerful drug. It makes people do some insane stuff. I dont believe CRsr has the opportunity to kill or wound the murderer(s). My best guess is he was caught off guard by someone he trusted and wasnt able to get to his own weapons in order to defend himself.
Speaking of lucky, Ive been researching the probability of coincidences. Partly because I struggle with accepting that there were so many coincidences surrounding these murders and also because its my opinion that LE finds all the coincidences puzzling as well.
The study of coincidences requires a basic education in probability. Why? Because the lower the probability (or the higher the improbability), the more likely that there is a hidden cause or explanation.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ps...incidence/201705/synchronicity-statistics?amp
https://understandinguncertainty.org/node/129
A couple links on probability and coincidences.
All 4 houses were supposed to or did have house guests that night.
MG was supposed to spend the night with HHG, but instead didnt make the turn onto UHR and went home and slept in her own bed.
KR2 was supposed to spend the night with HMR, but took a last minute babysitting job and her bf had a toothache.
DS was supposed to spend the night with KR to go to a car audition the next morning. He didnt stay the night and also didnt go over the next morning to go to the car auction.
GR was staying with CRsr.
Then theres JW, who dyed his hair. BJM who just happened to have two friends with her the morning she discovered 4 bodies. The entire W family who didnt attend one funeral and then packed up an moved 4000 miles away. Theres more, but Im trying not to ramble.
I was thinking of sitting down and analyzing the crime at each Rhoden crime scene. Step by step. We've done some of this before here and there. Doing it can tell us something about the killers. Anyone want to volunteer to go to UHR to photograph scenes, exit routes, etc.? Well?
Im happy to help analyze. A few things we could start with are the murder weapon(s)-were they weapons of opportunity such as a knife laying on the counter? No, the weapons were guns and definitely not a weapon of opportunity.
Another thing to consider is that BJM stated she lifted a blanket off of CRsr. A victim being covered by the perpetrator(s) is typically a sign of remorse, shame, or guilt.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/disturbed/201110/profiling-murderer?amp
Sparing young children and animals could be an indication that the killer(s) has a soft spot for kids and animals. Or perhaps, young children and animals were spared because they cant talk.
These are all just my thoughts and opinions mixed with some research, but both my head and my heart tell me the Rhodens and Hannah Gilley were not killed because of some type of organized crime.